It's almost like most people will just use whatever is most convenient to get around, regardless of what exactly that is.
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
611 points (98.7% liked)
World News
38553 readers
2889 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
With ebikes the range becomes less of an issue, and the cost is low. Cars with expensive maintenance and high travel and parking costs (after looking for a spot). Your bike you just chuck in front of the store.
Bike bags and good clothing and you can easily travel the city while getting in some exercise.
Added, cities become cheaper in maintenance and way prettier and fun to live in.
This is true even in the states. I bought an electric scooter and sold my car a year ago and haven't looked back. The more I ride, the more people I see doing the same. The only downsides are weather and dodging cars.
The dodging cars can be resolved by the Council making actual protected bike lanes. Not a bicycle gutter, if they strip a lane of a stroad on each side it can be replaced with a wider pavement, bike lane, grass strip with trees... Safety, shade, nature...epic win for everyone.
Yeah, but then were would the drivers park?
Why doesn't anybody think of the poor drivers???! /s
Road - parking - green buffer - bike lane - sidewalk - stores.
Where there is parking the green buffer is narrow and where there is no parking the green buffer is wide. Alternatively the parking is covered by PV panels.
But, but, but ...
Then the road would be much more narrow and drivers would find it harder to fit their ever larger penile-compensation vehicles in it, not to mention their egos!
To a point. If you are the only rider, your risk of dying is very high, because no one around is expecting it. Sometimes the right choice is to keep driving until the infrastructure finally makes things safe.
That is exactly the foresight our planners luckily had in the Netherlands. Build it and they will come. Now after more than 50 years of adding on the infrastructure is so accommodating.
This is a valid point. People indeed aren't looking out for unusual vehicles going 20mph. It's the same reason motorcycle lane splitting works fine in California but would be a disaster in say Florida. People aren't expecting it.
I think it's inevitable though that more and more people will be using electric bikes/scooters in the coming years simply because people can no longer afford cars.
A decent E-Bike costs at least 3k Euro, and they get stolen. Not if, when. I say: use your legs. It's healthy. And that tells you a fat German (who loves and uses his bicycle - which was btw stolen last week)
Wouldn't 3k Euro be essentially the luxury sedan of ebikes? My first was a class 1 aimed at tourist rentals that cost around $1.5k CAD ($1k Euro). I considered that entry level at the time, though there are cheaper ones out there now. My current one is a $2.5k CAD ($1.7k Euro) class 2. It is pretty much everything I could want in a bike. I can't see myself spending more. Well, maybe a cargo model would cost more?
I get what you're saying about theft though. I am lucky in that I have indoor parking both at home and work. A coworker of mine lives in a condo where he can't park a bike indoors. So while it was thankfully never stolen, he was sufficiently nervous about it that he eventually sold his and replaced it with an escooter.
A Moma 26 is a pretty good ebike with 70km range, you can pick one up brand new for 1K. OP is possibly a bike snob ;)
You can also convert a normal bike for less than €500, and it's incredibly easy
Source? Doesn't sound that easy
Front wheel drive. Change the front wheel for an electric one, it's the same as fitting a normal wheel, takes less than 30 seconds.
The controller box is hung in a bag, anywhere on the frame.
The batteries come in multiple fitting types; frame, seatpost, luggage rack
The rest is cable ties
I've done one in less than an hour, but to do it tidily takes about 4
Source - Me. Been doing it since the pandemic when it really took off
Interesting. Got any product links?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ebike+conversion+kit
Here you go. Don’t forget to update us with the results of your research.
🤡
A decent E-Bike in Germany costs 3k€ and up. Luxury ones start at 5k€.
I don't get the anti ebike stance.
Decent is less, used is fine too and less than 1000. For 3k you get a proper bike, new. And with ebikes you can consistently move at 20+kph. So further away becomes feasible for many. Especially on the commute. But you do you. Non ebikes are great too especially an old bike if you have to park it publicly cause theft is an issue.
bought my ebike a year ago for 600 usd, lock it up in a good place and its jist as likely to get stolen as anything else. i wouldnt be cycling to work daily if i had to push my bags up the hills to work, the motor helps my little legs get stronger without killing my motivation
Why not a normal bike then?
I've lived and worked in several large european cities, commuting in most of them by bicyle, and the most I ever spent on a commuting bicyle was €250 and generally it was more like €100 because I usually bought them used.
Finding a cheap bicycle was definitelly easier in The Netherlands, but I also got some nice cheap second-hand ones in London and Berlin.
Absolutelly, those things get stollen (which is why you get a lock, but even then, all it takes is a mistake and it's likelly you'll never see that bicycle again), which is why you don't pony up for a brand new carbon fibre bicycle for commuting unless you're planning on making a big involuntary charitable donation to a random bicycle thief.
I'm not even against you advice to walk - were I am it's quite dangerous to cycle (here in Portugal drivers are some of the worst in Europe) plus I live in a small city nowadays, so unlike most people here I refuse to buy a car and mainly walk - it's just that human-powered cycling is a more natural alternative to E-Bikes than walking in places were drivers aren't quite as bad.
Peachtree, GA is proof of this
I'd definitely use rail and cycling over driving even if it was less convenient. The problem is most of the time it is impossible or dangerous.
I'm taking the bus to work at the moment because it is more enjoyable that driving eventhough I have to walk 5 minutes each end and it takes longer.
So jealous… I think where I live, a doubling of the cycling population would be like "Oh hey look, there's another guy!"
I hope to see some serious studies on a multitude of categories from average health of a Paris citizen and traffic collisions/deaths.
yes, like when you google:
"Oslo traffic deaths"
pretty cool stuff.
I expected to at least see what number doubled in one year.
I also would like to see the numbers... This article links to another one that supposedly goes into more detail (I see graphs at least) but it's in French so hard to say. I'd love some absolute numbers rather than percentages as percentages can give the wrong impression depending on what numbers we're dealing with.
That graph shows the average cyclists per hour through 128 counting points. You can see it doubles for almost every hour every day of the week, the max peak going from ~130 to ~260 cyclists/hour.
Thanks for digging up/translating the info!
Thank you for providing legitimate discourse. Pretty rare in this kind of thread, but it's important.
I've looked at the Le Monde article, my French is super basic but what you can see in the chart (the number that's doubled) is the average number of cyclists through 128 counting points, with a peak on Tuesday evening with more than 250 cyclists/hour. And before someone tries to just multiply by 128 to get the total number, no, you can't. There's not enough information.
You can click through to the article in Le Monde, though it's in French. I assume that article also links to a report somewhere.
I put my Duolingo to the test and attempted to read the Le Monde article. As far as I could tell it's mostly just percentages too; the only absolute numbers I could find were these:
Sur l’avenue de Flandre, le boulevard Voltaire et le boulevard Magenta, la moyenne ne dépasse jamais 384 véhicules motorisés à l’heure sur la partie centrale de la chaussée, contre 537 vélos sur les pistes cyclables en septembre et en octobre.
Translation:
On Flanders Avenue, Voltaire Boulevard and Magenta Boulevard, the average never exceeds 384 motor vehicles per hour on the central part of the roadway, compared to 537 bicycles on the bike trail in September and October.
I think that's discussing a particularly extreme example, but still, if bike traffic is actually exceeding car traffic anywhere that's pretty damn good!
Good, but not really surprising. The Netherlands is the best case example of what good bike infrastructure means in its "consequences" (no negative connotations). That's why I get terribly annoyed when I see people constantly argue against it, or wanting to do a couple hundred more feasibility studies and whatnot for every single street, or even just parts of it. It's exhausting how humankind keeps working against its own self-interest.
I lived in London during a period when commuting by bicycle was becoming more popular and you can really notice that as drivers get more accustomed to cyclists it becomes safer to cycle (even when the actual infrastructure for it is a bit of a joke, such as all the "Boris cycling lanes" beyond zone 2 in London which were nothing more than tiny signs every 500m on the side of otherwise unchanged roads with a white on blue drawing of a bicyle) which in turn pools in more normal people to cycle (rather than the more hard-core, dressed like they're in the Tour de France, crowd).
Granted, it's a lot more effective with a real push for it as seems to have been done here, my point is that in my experience there is a networking effect of having more cyclists pulling in more people to cycle, bot directly (they see others do it and consider doing it themselves) and indirectly such as by cycling becoming more safe the more drivers get used to sharing the road with cyclists.
I wish that cycling and public transport was funded as much as the roads and car industry. Fuckcars
It's mad to look at train lines that as being too expensive short term, yet it's a 150+ year investment, and has so many improvements, not least of which it increases the value of land around the station (something that isn't captured in most countries assessments of rail income, though is in Japan)
Yes and I'm sure trains work out as the cheaper option when you look at the number of passengers they carry vs the upkeep vs building a new road every few years.
Meanwhile cycling in any major US city is extremely unsafe and they ban cyclists from the sidewalks.
The irony being that US roads have obscenely ample room for bike infrastructure compared to European ones.
yes but my freedum
Induced demand, but in a positive way.
I thought it might have had to do with Covid ending but that was two years ago. Time do be going fast.