catloaf

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago

Probably the guy trying to arrest his political opponents just for existing. I don't know enough details about the election to say anything about that, but arresting political candidates for political reasons makes you a bad guy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Against which regular user database?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I specifically opened a few apps to break up any large blocks of one color.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Voice acting has been good enough in the past few decades that it's usually usable without re-recording. Maybe remastering at most.

There's also plenty of tooling to upscale textures too, even without AI. The biggest hurdle (for assets, at least) is 3D models. You can slap a subdivision modifier on them to make them higher-poly, but you'd still have to make sure the UVs didn't get messed up (or whatever it is that they're using these days). And also verify that nothing weird happened like new geometry hiding or showing something in-game. (Collision probably doesn't need to change if you're just increasing polycount.)

[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

That sounds like a you problem, because a PNG screenshot of my full 5120x1440 desktop is about 850 kB.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

I'd like to see that data. I'd be surprised if it exists, companies rarely release that level of detail on their finances.

And "evil" is a very strong word. We're talking about video games, a luxury recreational product.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

https://tesrskywind.com/

https://skyblivion.com/

Project Arroyo seems dead, though, so no Fallout that I know of.

But why no official ones? They don't think it would be profitable. Microsoft and Bethesda are businesses first.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Well the name checks out, at least. You're ascribing far too much capability to spammers. And that Twitter thing was an obvious fake.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Good thing nobody is poor!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

The alternative method would be to use professional equipment or send it to a data recovery specialist.

Did my suggestion to use photorec in your last post not work? How do you even know that the runs of zeroes are where the files you're looking for are? Encrypted data and uninitialized space look like random data, so any runs of zeroes are either valid data or something explicitly zeroed.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I would certainly try.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Then you were the exception.

 

Link to post: https://lemmy.world/post/19274834

If you tap that link in Boost it'll probably crash, so don't do it unless you're okay with that.

I'm guessing the problem is that the post URL is a magnet link.

Edit: oh yeah, to work around, you'll have to open it in a browser and hide it.

 

I got banned earlier today with the message "rule 1", no other information about why, or which comment broke the rule. As far as I can tell it was this one, which just says "We want the bot gone. That’s it. It’s really that simple."

So I checked the modlog for other bans, and @[email protected] was banned today as well, also just for "rule 1", probably either for the comment saying "a stupid bot writing useless bullshit" or "This is what you call "Not listening to criticism."", neither of which are an attack on any person.

(Also earlier today @[email protected] was banned with the message "fuck off", which I'm pretty sure is not a reason to ban someone from a major community, but doesn't appear to be related to the MBFC bot.)

One more today, @[email protected] was banned, again just "rule 1", last comment being this one, again not an attack on any person.

So what's the deal here? I couldn't find any rules for mods on lemmy.world with a brief poke around, but are we letting mods run major communities like little fiefdoms, banning people for criticism?

view more: next ›