this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
259 points (92.7% liked)

World News

32026 readers
1045 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 57 points 8 months ago (23 children)

China's EV revolution showcases the power that state actors have when an industry is a matter of national security.

China has marginal domestic O&G reserves, so moving off of O&G is incredibly important for Chinese interests.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And since the oil and gas companies in China are nationalized, they will follow along with the government's plans rather than obstruct or bribe their way as with for-profit private oil and gas companies in many western countries.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Woah hold the phone, you're telling me there's a way to build society OTHER than by explicitly rewarding greed and exploitation‽

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (6 children)

It is a similar story in Saudi Arabia and many Arab countries. The oil and gas is nationally owned, and the revenues are being used to finance a massive welfare state as well as the transition away from fossil fuels.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They also don’t seem to have many standards either. Specs and reviews I’ve seen seem to jump generations within a few months. I think my favorite ridiculous spec was the ability to use two fast chargers (one on either side of the car since it has two plugs) to pump some 300 miles in 5-10 minutes. It’s wild to read about the stuff they’re doing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is there any safety reason to not be able to have two plugs? I could see that being something we could do to renovate western gas stations for EVs in order to facilitate the transition. Just have two plugs side by side so Jim-bob could get his 300 miles in 10 minutes with electric just lol he does with his diesel now

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Definitely heat, and a design to handle it. Ford has an issue with some Mach-E’s that the power junction would weld itself shut if you used the DC fast charger and floored the car shortly after. Once that happened it bricks the car and you gotta replace the part.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago (6 children)

It's worth noting that this is not being done for environmental reasons (more half of all coal pollution comes from China), but for strategic reasons as China has limited access to oil near it's borders.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I mean, that's a pretty good reason. I'm not too concerned why they do a good thing, as long as it's done.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention that they are the world's biggest manufacturing power, so whatever they make for themselves will likely also benefit the rest of the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

An EV running on a coal fired grid still has less emissions that a prius. Facts dont care about your feelings.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Could you please run us through your maths? I'm legit curious.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (5 children)

An ICE is only, at most, 35% efficient. In contrast to lithium batteries and electric motors, which is more like 90% efficient. Electricity produced from the dirtiest coal plants that exist, used in an EV, is more efficient and, thus, more environmentally conscious, than burning gasoline in an ICE.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Coal power plant efficiency is less than 40%. You'd also not get 90% of the outlet on the wheels. There is also a lot of loss on the grid, but there is also on the production of fuel. The two pollute almost the same.

Burning coal however is a lot worse for the air quality.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I don't know if their statement is universally true, but the EPA's fuel economy / total emissions calculator seems to show it for what I've put in. You can put in a Prius or random EV and see how they compare.

https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/electric-vehicle-myths#Myth1

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=bt2

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

A Prius will definitely pollute less than the typical SUV electric cars on a coal grid.

Cause:

  • Efficiency of coal power plant and all losses are as bad as ICE cars. The EVs do thermal->mechanical->electrical->grid->battery->wheels and if you count them all up, is not better than an EV

  • Prius is designed for low drag unlike an SUV

  • Prius had regenerative braking like an EV

But just the numbers:

  • Prius is rated at 94g/kg

  • Coal 950g/kwh

  • Volvo c40 0.2kwh/km or 190g/km even without losses

I took Volvo cause they published a report with a good compare ev and ICE https://www.volvocars.com/images/v/-/media/market-assets/intl/applications/dotcom/pdf/c40/volvo-c40-recharge-lca-report.pdf

Even with the current EU energy mix, it takes 77'000 km to be better than ICE, so arguably better. On coal electricity, they are worse. And this is comparing equally sized cars, a Prius will do better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Regardless of the accuracy of your numbers - If you fix the ICE cars as they wear out, replacing them with BEV as the energy grid retires coal plants or goes to a higher percentage of renewables, they get cleaner. ICE cars will be as dirty tomorrow as they are today.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Is it worth mentioning? Why?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

What a ridiculous distinction. Do you really think this narrative difference in motivation is noteworthy? What is scarcity if not an environmental consideration? What is lack of sustainability if not an environmental consideration?

It's being done because it leads to a sustainable equilibrium of their social system. Whether that meets your standards of rhetorical "intentionality" to meet the criteria for "environmentalism" is meaningless.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Car engines are immensely inefficient and car charging is a load that's easy to load-balance for renewables (dynamic pricing see: Tesla)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

Now do coal

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Also worth mentioning that it's not just cars, but public transit and city planning.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

As a Saudi I'm happy with this development. The future of cars is electric.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

But at what cost?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Where are the batteries coming from?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Maybe it's crazy idea but... China?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

“Every car you start driving with electricity, you’re not driving with oil,” said Robert Brecha, a professor of sustainability at the University of Dayton in Ohio

The journalist has to have a personal grudge against him. That d'oh quotation makes him seem dumber than my dog.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

And it's not even necessarily true: it takes a certain mileage to offset the extra CO2 that an electric vehicle requires for its manufacturing (mostly batteries), which directly depends on the grid's carbon intensity. If you recharge your EV from a coal or oil plant, you are still burning coal and oil.

load more comments
view more: next ›