this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
681 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

58140 readers
5404 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC chair wants to boost broadband standard to 100Mbps::First refresh of minimums in eight years for the country that invented the internet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 133 points 1 year ago (6 children)

My God is American internet awful

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have 100mbps of non bandwidth capped internet in America, you're doing damn good for yourself.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what if it costs $95/mo, there are no alternatives and the price has nearly doubled in 10 years from $55?

I sure don't feel that great.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I pay the equivalent of $64 for 1 gigabit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

American internet isn’t all crap. I pay about $70 for Gigabit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You must live in a large city or near one

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can get business gigabit for $90 a month where I live.

Funny thing is that is the rural option, in town I have to go with Comcast and pay $160 a month for half a gigabit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Scrolled too far down before a mention of Comcast. I was in charge of a handful of locations where we needed broadband. They were geographically diverse enough that we had to go with different options. Comcast was the most expensive, and by a lot. Like 30%, and the slowest in dl/ul by a large margin. Comcast was also the second worst one to deal with. The actual worst one was the faster, slightly less expensive Spectrum. They had by far the worst service. A couple of locations had small DSL companies that were a delight to deal with and reasonably priced, but slow as balls. And then one location had a municipal fiber option that was the cheapest, fastest, and easiest to deal with by far. Like, I swear to god I could call them and talk to a real network engineer that no joke actually knew more than I did. I don't mean this to sound arrogant; I am not great with networking. I'm just saying compared to "yeah, I have that in bridge mode because I don't need router capability I'm running my own" and being answered with something like "whoa I'm going to need to get a supervisor" vs them being like "hey can you open a terminal and..." Yes, yes I can open a terminal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh no, Comcast is a terrible fucking company, we agree there.

Its just that in the city, it is either them, or ATT with literally a DSL connection. Coax, or DSL, that's your options lmao.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You pay $4 more than I do for the same thing (with no bandwidth cap). If you're not out in the sticks, internet is fine here.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's a lot better than Australian internet. I'm getting 20-50mbps

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had 2Mbps (yes, bits, not bytes) until 2020. Then I moved out. Pretty sure that my parents house still only gets that same speed. And this is in fucking Germany, a pretty densely populated country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

As a Swede, I usually get well above 3 Mbit/s on 3G, and I have a 100/100 Mbit/s fiber that I often use to its full potential, and that's with a VPN on. I really thought Germany had better infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure I'd get a faster speed than that in a piece of string.

Honestly that sounds like the cable was damaged, was that really the actual target speed?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, genuinely target speed. Germany is just incredibly behind when it comes to the internet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That sucks too...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can ONLY get 1gbit, where i live. (Denmark)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Denmark is also around 1/200th of the size of the us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow I had that in 2008. Damn that sucks. You can't even stream 4K HDR video.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm fine with 1080p tbh. Also If I really wanted to stream 4k I could use data (around 80mbps 4G)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It depends. I grew up in the country and my parents still have to use phone hotspots for internet which works well for streaming but forget about any gaming. I live in a fairly major metropolitan city now and my internet is pretty good, although I've noticed my download speeds get throttled sometimes

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It can be, but I live in a semi-rural neighborhood outside of a town that doesn't even have 100,000 people and I'm still getting 400/400 on fiber (and can get higher speeds if I want to pay for them).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In rural areas, yes.

In cities, Gigabit internet is abundant and only mildly expensive. Here in Phoenix I pay $60/mo for 1 Gbps down, 50 Mbps up with no bandwidth cap from Verizon. Not the best but far from "awful".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I live in a major metropolitan city in the us and I pay close to $200 a month for gig down and less than 100up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You might not have to. Look into fixed 5G internet. So long as you have a view of a tower (which you should in a major metropolitan city; I'm in suburbia and still have 3 within view), speeds and latency are as good as a wired connection. I'd look into it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have to run my own cell tower because I live in a literal dead zone.

Edit: I checked Verizon, 90 bucks for 50mbps with a 300gb data limits. Yay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That sucks. Happens when there's no competition in your area. Verizon is $60 for 1Gbps here, no data cap, because they have to compete with Cox. Greedy bastards.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I pay $65 for 1Gb symmetrical and no cap. But I have options for ISPs. My parents in rural Washington have the option of wireless internet at 10Mbps for $70/month or HughesNet satellite for some ungodly amount with worse speed. Starlink is still not available there.