this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
681 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

58117 readers
5090 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC chair wants to boost broadband standard to 100Mbps::First refresh of minimums in eight years for the country that invented the internet

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 133 points 1 year ago (10 children)

My God is American internet awful

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have 100mbps of non bandwidth capped internet in America, you're doing damn good for yourself.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

But what if it costs $95/mo, there are no alternatives and the price has nearly doubled in 10 years from $55?

I sure don't feel that great.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's a lot better than Australian internet. I'm getting 20-50mbps

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I had 2Mbps (yes, bits, not bytes) until 2020. Then I moved out. Pretty sure that my parents house still only gets that same speed. And this is in fucking Germany, a pretty densely populated country.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That sucks too...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It depends. I grew up in the country and my parents still have to use phone hotspots for internet which works well for streaming but forget about any gaming. I live in a fairly major metropolitan city now and my internet is pretty good, although I've noticed my download speeds get throttled sometimes

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It can be, but I live in a semi-rural neighborhood outside of a town that doesn't even have 100,000 people and I'm still getting 400/400 on fiber (and can get higher speeds if I want to pay for them).

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you’re going to initiate a new rollout of tech, why rollout already out of date stuff? Just mandate fibre to the prem and 1 gigabit minimum from the start. It will take 15 years to complete anyway!

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Government officials in areas where 100 Mbps internet isn’t already available are too busy making sure trans people can’t use the toilet or play high school sports.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're also waiting for their trans porn to download.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

That's way too hard for this country.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How will the isps get another government grant to roll out the next bit of outdated tech?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How will the isps get another government grant to ~~roll out the next bit of outdated tech~~ outright refuse to update any infrastructure and perform stock buybacks instead?

FTFY. Google the Connect America Fund if you want your blood pressure to spike. ISPs are notorious for taking taxpayer money and doing fuck-all with it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are fucking all of us with it. Does that count?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Sure, but how is that going to make more money for rich people?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What about net neutrality? Does anyone remember net neutrality? I'd like that back please. I'd also like the opportunity to publicly flog Ajit Pai as long as we're dreaming.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I would be content with just stealing his comically oversized Reese's mug.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is that not already the standard?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

where i live my choices are fixed beam wireless internet that caps out at about 75mbps, at&t dsl that caps at 10mbps, satellite or i guess Starlink

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it's a healthy and competitive market right?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

super healthy, very competitive

did i mention that i barely get 5G service at my home but if i walk 100ft down to the street i get service?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At my house I get 500mbps. My store (40 miles away) gets 15mbps. I pay significantly less at home.

Not just that but you have to pay extra to avoid a data cap on the 15mbps line.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Datacaps are incredibly annoying, they are just a cash grab.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. That’s exactly what they are.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not only that, 100Mbps is so 2018. Quit pussy-footing around, FCC, make the standard 1Gbps, both ways. And make bandwidth caps illegal. I'm lucky enough to not have one but for years I had to put up with a 1TB limit from those Cox suckers until Verizon came to town.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do United States really doesn't want to live in the 21st century does it?

The slowest speed by internet service provider offers is 250mbps.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We spent like 5k per household to get fiber everywhere in the US. Then the companies who were supposed to do it just decided to take the money and not do it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

And the government continues to give them more money. I've figured it out now.

People want better broadband. ISPs promise to broaden internet. Government gives money. ISPs spend a considerable amount of the promise of better broadband in marketing. Doesn't happen. People still want better broadband. ISPs promise again. Government gives more money. ISPs continue spending on marketing.

Over and over.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Didn't we already pay for the infrastructure?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

is this about that Connect America Fund where the ISPs took all the money and did fuck all

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You'd think that would be criminal

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the United States, where consumers built the internet infrastructure that monopolies profit from and fight tooth and nail to prevent communities from providing high speed internet to its residents. Capitalism at its most corrupt: privatize profits and socialize capital costs and losses.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gigabit symmetrical or GTFO.

I pay something like $110/mo for my symmetrical gigabit fiber line (plus static IP). This should be the standard, not 100Mbps.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I pay €32.5 for gigabit, but honestly it's overkill for most people. I only got it because a competitor of my ISP was doing a promotion which got me from a 50 mbit (60-70 in practise) at around the same price to a gigabit for a year.

I honestly only used it to its full potential downloading a tv show because a certain streaming provider who pulled the plug on family sharing decided my house isn't my house and I couldn't watch the shows I paid to watch.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

why just 100Mbps? why not 250? that’s still pretty simple for them to do. also: net neutrality, dammit!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$40 for 2Gb/s symmetrical FTW!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lucky bastard

Also, where, and how?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

sometimes I really worry for the US

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I pay 30$ for 1Gb/s down, 250Mb/s up. It's usually around 40$ in the Czech Republic.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

And at least 50 up?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

And? CableOne promised us 300Mbps, we already had 100. Then they went and renamed themselves Sparklight...

Guess what went out the window?...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I'm paying $25 fo a 20mbps ADSL, but I only get 16down/1up due to the cable degradation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is pathetic.

load more comments
view more: next ›