this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
681 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

58140 readers
5132 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC chair wants to boost broadband standard to 100Mbps::First refresh of minimums in eight years for the country that invented the internet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what if it costs $95/mo, there are no alternatives and the price has nearly doubled in 10 years from $55?

I sure don't feel that great.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I pay the equivalent of $64 for 1 gigabit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

American internet isn’t all crap. I pay about $70 for Gigabit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You must live in a large city or near one

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can get business gigabit for $90 a month where I live.

Funny thing is that is the rural option, in town I have to go with Comcast and pay $160 a month for half a gigabit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Scrolled too far down before a mention of Comcast. I was in charge of a handful of locations where we needed broadband. They were geographically diverse enough that we had to go with different options. Comcast was the most expensive, and by a lot. Like 30%, and the slowest in dl/ul by a large margin. Comcast was also the second worst one to deal with. The actual worst one was the faster, slightly less expensive Spectrum. They had by far the worst service. A couple of locations had small DSL companies that were a delight to deal with and reasonably priced, but slow as balls. And then one location had a municipal fiber option that was the cheapest, fastest, and easiest to deal with by far. Like, I swear to god I could call them and talk to a real network engineer that no joke actually knew more than I did. I don't mean this to sound arrogant; I am not great with networking. I'm just saying compared to "yeah, I have that in bridge mode because I don't need router capability I'm running my own" and being answered with something like "whoa I'm going to need to get a supervisor" vs them being like "hey can you open a terminal and..." Yes, yes I can open a terminal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh no, Comcast is a terrible fucking company, we agree there.

Its just that in the city, it is either them, or ATT with literally a DSL connection. Coax, or DSL, that's your options lmao.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You pay $4 more than I do for the same thing (with no bandwidth cap). If you're not out in the sticks, internet is fine here.