this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
300 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4470 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For a "winner" he's doing a lot of losing

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It’s a matter of definition.

He defines winning as flipping the board over.

He doesn’t like sports or games he can’t cheat at, including redefining what the win condition is.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

I'm still chuckling that the loser was upset when The Amazing Race kept beating The Apprentice for awards and he whined it was rigged lmao.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

redefining what the win condition is

remember when he redefined the wind condition with a black marker?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do sharpies cause gas or something?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yes.

No, I will not elaborate.

Spoiler💨ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

That's not definition. That's redefinition.

It's called logocentrism.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

This case is literally about having sex with a porn star and then paying her (illegally) to lie about it. I love how MAGA idiots will spout nonsense (and demand legislation) about traditional, Biblical family values and then vote for the fraudulent, adulterous, lying, sex offending rich man. Matthew 19:24 - "Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God." Straight from the mouth of Jesus himself, Trump isn't getting into Heaven. I guess to MAGA it doesn't matter because Trump is the new Messiah.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They worship the OT God tho. The one who has anger issues, bright lines, kills for land, and makes those he favors rich. Like ~~Abram~~ Abraham, Solomon, David.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Psalm 137:8-9: "Daughter Babylon, doomed to destruction, happy is the one who repays you according to what you have done to us. Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks."

1 Samuel 15:3 - "Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.” (Netanyahu actually referenced this one in a speech last year).

Oh, and if you want to know how to treat captives of war Deuteronomy 21:10-14 has you covered: "When you go to war against your enemies and the Lord your God delivers them into your hands and you take captives, if you notice among the captives a beautiful woman and are attracted to her, you may take her as your wife. Bring her into your home and have her shave her head, trim her nails and put aside the clothes she was wearing when captured. After she has lived in your house and mourned her father and mother for a full month, then you may go to her and be her husband and she shall be your wife. If you are not pleased with her, let her go wherever she wishes. You must not sell her or treat her as a slave, since you have dishonored her." (You can claim a woman whose family you just killed, and force her to have sex with you, but afterwards if you decide you don't want her you have to simply toss her out, not actually sell her into slavery because you've "dishonored her" with sex.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It really isn't about that. It's about falsifying business records.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I'll edit to "paying her (illegally) to lie about it."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Since when is F5 Monday a thing?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

So much winning!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Seems like things are starting to unravel a bit.