this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
191 points (89.3% liked)

World News

32075 readers
1428 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
191
American intelligence withheld information on Moscow terror attacks out of fear of exposing intelligence sources or methods (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The adversarial relationship between Washington and Moscow prevented U.S. officials from sharing any information about the plot beyond what was necessary, out of fear Russian authorities might learn their intelligence sources or methods.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 82 points 5 months ago (3 children)

We told them there was an increased risk. They don’t need to know how we know or the specifics. They chose not to listen or act, and completely dismissed our advice as nonsense. This is on them.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pfffft.... Russia already knew it was Ukraine long before USA received intel about ISIS preparing the attack. /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Those Ukrainian Jewish Nazi ISIS supporters! They're the worst!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The US publicly said that there was an increased risk in Moscow for the 48 hours following March 7th. Whether they privately said anything more is unknown (neither side is too eager to share).

Indeed, for the 48 hours following March 7th, security at places like Crocus City Hall was ramped up.

Edit: would you like to hazard a guess as to what was happening at Crocus City Hall on March 7th-9th?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

"We" "Our"

you are not the American government. They are your oppressors. They are not on your side.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's a purposeful twist of language by you.

The way they used "we" simply implies they are a citizen of the US, not that they are an agent of the US gov security apparatus.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I-... no I was not calling anyone a federal agent, why is that where your mind went??

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Oh, u just don't do words gud, my bad

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

*you

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

username

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK~!!

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago

No u

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Seeing how you immediately blocked me after I called you out i'm going to go on a limb and say you weren't posting in good faith. EDIT: They didn't.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't block you what are you on about

So now words bad and Lemmy features bad

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ok I didn't get a notification for your reply so that's why I came to that conclusion, must have been a federation bug.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Apologize

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

🧎‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Cool we good