hendrik

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Sure. I usually do the same thing. The laptop on which I'm typing right now is a refurbished Dell one and I really prefer a bit older enterprise hardware to new consumer hardware. Nice build quality, no nonsense and Linux runs great on that device. And it cost me a fraction of a new machine. However... with the intended use-case of a media center I'm not sure. Intel always adds hardware acceleration in their iGPUs and the modern codecs are quite demanding. I wouldn't buy an older generation that doesn't really support AV1. I'm not sure if hardware from 2 years ago can do that. And if someone buys a new TV set which supports HDR or something and then the recently bought, refurbished media center is out of date again... that also doesn't help. Maybe I'd buy a new one in this case and just use it for the next 10 years. That's also sustainable. But yeah, you have to pay attention to the details if you're buying off-brand. But that also applies to most computer hardware, regardless. It's a bit more of a lottery with cheap and off-brand devices.

 

Seems they recently changed something on Spotify and all the tools I've tried fail now. And DownOnSpot which seems promising has received a cease and desist letter and got taken down. What do you people use? I want something that actually fetches the audio from Spotify, not just rip it from YouTube. And it has to work as of now. Does the latest commit from DownOnSpot work? Back when I tested it a few weeks ago it failed due to some API changes. Are there other tools floating around?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Add some googly eyes if it "lives" in the living room. They fit right above the switch which would then become the nose.

Yeah back when I needed storage (quite some years ago) the mini pcs were less capable and more pricey, so I ended up building a NAS myself. It's a regular, yet very power efficient PC. But due to size, it doesn't fit next to the TV. If I'd do the same thing today, I'd certainly consider a machine like this. And $200 doesn't sound much for a 2-bay NAS.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Uuhh, that's a cute little trash can. Now fit that with the maximum of RAM it supports and two 12TB harddrives... And it'll do more media center and NAS than the average person needs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Are the genome AIs more capable than the average ChatGPT? Or do they also sound convincing but fail at every real-world task given to them that has some degree of complexity? I'm not sure if I'm supposed to be afraid of them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (12 children)

Someone linked a list of Mini-PCs here: https://lemmy.world/post/19837516

I think the N100 sounds good. But I can't comment on buying a cheap chinesium one versus a refurbished Fujitsu/Lenovo or an Intel NUC.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 17 hours ago

Those videos don't make it to my filter bubble. But I agree.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

Aside from Lemmy and getting random news via social media... I have a set of news sites and computer magazines I like. I think we have several good ones. I visit them manually when I'm in the mood.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tja, der Artikel hat schon über 300 teils recht treffende Kommentare. Ich hab dem wenig zuzufügen. Denke auch die Geflüchteten sollten besser dankbar und devot sein und bloß nicht ihre echte Lebensrealität schildern. Sonst gibt es nur Beschwerden. /s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Also Akkus können ordentlich Feuer fangen, aber so explodieren können die von sich aus nicht.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It comes with a load of different perspectives and emotions. I agree with the person pointing out it has a lot to do with victimhood and blaming other people, if used as a self-description. I wouldn't use it that way. And using it on another person I think it's derogatory. So I also wouldn't use it unless I wanted to hurt someone.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

yeah, you don't listen. i'd say complaining is fine, generally in most circumstances. but it won't get you anywhere in this case.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Yeah, I don't think I agree with you at all. Software development and operation are vastly different jobs. Packaging is yet a different story. Maintainers need different things than developers. Handling dependencies is a chore, and you need lots of them if your product speaks dozens of protocols and can interconnect with thousands of devices, each with their own quirks... All the people have something in mind. They already pay attention to deployment and support several methods. Sure it's not the method you have in mind. But the world doesn't specifically revolve around you. There are other factors at play. And sure. It'd be awesome if we solved software packaging, dependency hell, the supply chain of larger projects and everything. It's just not easy. And reality has quite some limitations. It's just... fighting reality doesn't get you anywhere. Sometimes we have to make ends meet with imperfect solutions. Or you just live without a smart home. Or use a different software stack. I mean there is FHEM and some other projects.

And with that said, there is some merit to what you're saying. Software should be designed with usage in mind. It's just not easy and there are contradicting requirements. Either someone puts in all the effort to cater for your specific use-case... Or they don't.

 

I just found https://www.arliai.com/ who offer LLM inference for quite cheap. Without rate-limits and unlimited token generation. No-logging policy and they have an OpenAI compatible API.

I've been using runpod.io previously but that's a whole different service as they sell compute and the customers have to build their own Docker images and run them in their cloud, by the hour/second.

Should I switch to ArliAI? Does anyone have some experience with them? Or can recommend another nice inference service? I still refuse to pay $1.000 for a GPU and then also pay for electricity when I can use some $5/month cloud service and it'd last me 16 years before I reach the price of buying a decent GPU...

Edit: Saw their $5 tier only includes models up to 12B parameters, so I'm not sure anymore. For larger models I'd need to pay close to what other inference services cost.

 

tl;dr: Be excellent to each other, do something constructive here?

I'm not sure anymore where the Threadiverse is headed. (The Threadiverse being this threaded part of the Fediverse, i.e. Lemmy, MBin, PieFed, ...)
In my time here, I've met a lot of nice people and had meaningful conversations and learned lots of things. At the same time, it's always been a mixed bag. We've always had quite some argumentative people here, trolls, ... I've seen people hate on and yell at each other, and do all kinds of destructive things. My issue with that is: Negative behavior is disproportionately affecting the atmosphere. And I'd argue we have nowhere enough nice behavior to even that out.

I don't see Lemmy grow for quite some time now. Seems it's now leveling off at a bit less that 50k monthly active users. And I don't see how that'd change. I'm missing some clear vision/idea of where we want to be headed. And I miss an atmosphere that makes people want to join or stay here, of all of the places on the internet. The saying is: "If you don't go forwards you go backwards". I'm not sure if this applies... At least we're not shrinking anymore.

And I'm always unsure if the tone and atmosphere here changes subtly and gradually. I've always disagreed with a few dynamics here. But lately it feels like we're on the decline, at least to me. I occasionally keep an eye on the votes on my comments. And seems I'm getting fewer of them. Sometimes I reply to a post and not a single person interacts. Even OP seems to have abandoned their post moments after writing it. And also for nuanced and longer replies, I regularly don't get more than one or two upvotes. I think that used to be a bit better at some point. And I see the same thing happening with other peoples' comments. So it's not just me writing low-quality comments. What does work is stating simple truths. I regularly get some incoming votes with those. But my vision of this place isn't spreading simple truths, but have proper and meaningful discussions, learn things and new perspectives or just mingle with people or talk. But judging by the votes I observe, that isn't appreciated by the community here.

Another pet peeve of mine is the link aggregator aspect of Lemmy. I'd say at least 80% of Lemmy is about dumping some political (or tech) news articles. Lots of them don't generate any engagement. Lots of them are really low-effort. OP just dumps something somewhere, no body text added, no info about what's interesting about it. And people don't even read those articles. They just read the title and react (emotionally) to that. In the end probably neither OP nor the audience read the article and it's just littering the place. Burying and diminishing other, meaningful content. (With that said: There are also nice (news) discussions going on at the same time. And Lemmy is meant to be a link aggregator. It's just that my perception is: it's skewed towards low quality, low engagement and random noise.)

A few people here also don't really like political debate. And there's no escape from it here on Lemmy since so much revolves around that. And nowadays politics is about strong opinions, emotions and emotional reactions. And often limited to that. The dynamics of Lemmy reinforce the negative aspect of that, because the time when you're most incentivized to reply or react is, when it triggers some strong emotion in you, for example you strongly disagree with a comment and that makes you want to counter it and write your own opinion underneath. If you agree, you don't feel a strong emotion and you don't reply. And the majority of users seems to also forget to upvote in that case, as I lined out earlier. And we also don't write nuanced answers, dissect complex things and examine it from all angles. That's just effort and it's not as rewarding for the brain to do that as it is pointing out that someone is wrong. So it just fosters an atmosphere of being argumentative.

Prospect

I think we have several ways of steering the community:

  1. Technology: Features in the software, design choices that foster good behavior.
  2. Moderation: Give toxic people the boot, or delete content that drags down the place. Following: What remains is nice people and not adverse content.
  3. The community

I'd say 1 and 2 go without saying. (Not that everything is perfect with those...) But it really boils down to 3: The community. This is a fairly participatory place. We are the ones shaping the tone and atmosphere. And it's our place. It's kind of our obligation to care for it if we want to see it go somewhere. Isn't it?

So what's your vision of this place? Do you have some idea on where you'd like it to go? Practical ideas on how to achieve it?
Do you even agree with my perception of the dynamics here, and the implications and conclusions I came up with?

view more: next ›