bhamlin

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would Russia want our trouble makers? Lol.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

You need to make sure you buy them from different places, otherwise they might each solve the same problems!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Schism in my ass

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Man in the Box in my ass.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well then I'm not playing it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It better have a satisfying "ping!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Hey, that's the combination on my luggage!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It isn't double jeopardy for two reasons. First, he wasn't found "not guilty," the charges were dismissed. Second, this is still the same trial; if they can convince the judge to reconsider then it's back on like it never stopped. They can also appeal the dismissal, which would have the same effect if the appeal is successful.

For context though, what the prosecution did yields with a dismissal with prejudice (if caught). It is the prosecution's duty to ensure that any evidence they have is turned over to the defense. Even if that evidence would tank the prosecution's case. That's the whole point. The state can't just railroad you because they can. They must play fair. What they did is pretty much a textbook Brady violation. I seriously doubt that the judge will reconsider, or that appeals will work. Unless the supreme court wants to fuck that up for us too...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

This might actually get an OSI approval, as it excludes Stallmans equally...

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

For scale, I need to know how much is an "acceptable" amount...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Your grandfather is Filthy Frank?!?

view more: ‹ prev next ›