bhamlin

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 minutes ago

You need to make sure you buy them from different places, otherwise they might each solve the same problems!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Schism in my ass

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Man in the Box in my ass.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

Well then I'm not playing it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

It better have a satisfying "ping!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Hey, that's the combination on my luggage!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It isn't double jeopardy for two reasons. First, he wasn't found "not guilty," the charges were dismissed. Second, this is still the same trial; if they can convince the judge to reconsider then it's back on like it never stopped. They can also appeal the dismissal, which would have the same effect if the appeal is successful.

For context though, what the prosecution did yields with a dismissal with prejudice (if caught). It is the prosecution's duty to ensure that any evidence they have is turned over to the defense. Even if that evidence would tank the prosecution's case. That's the whole point. The state can't just railroad you because they can. They must play fair. What they did is pretty much a textbook Brady violation. I seriously doubt that the judge will reconsider, or that appeals will work. Unless the supreme court wants to fuck that up for us too...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

This might actually get an OSI approval, as it excludes Stallmans equally...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

For scale, I need to know how much is an "acceptable" amount...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Your grandfather is Filthy Frank?!?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

Lucky you; spoiler tag was broken when I got to it. I have seen a thing I wish to unsee.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I sweat Brawndo?!?

 

view more: next ›