[he/him] Study makes a lot of sense, not here to comment on that... Been reading what some people have said here on Emily Oster, and I cannot agree, although I can understand how you may have reached that conclusion. I sincerely feel from she is making an earnest attempt to bring people the best facts we have on an issue, and help them make their own decision. Sorry for wasting your time. She has changed the way I try to frame my decision making so I couldn't not look into what everyone was saying, and I couldn't not say what I found cus this was stressful.
Schroed4
joined 1 year ago
A lot of people seem to just be reacting to this without reading and understand. Granted, Forbs does not go sufficiently in depth to the findings to make this easy.
From what I've read on this, the underlying study here has valuable information that we can all use, understand, and digest.
Does your role require a lot of colaberation? You may need to ensure you have something better than email and phones to replace your ability to talk to someone who would have otherwise sat next to you.
Do you have a lot of junior employees? You will likely need to spend more effort on ensuring they get the quality training they need.
Like.... Sure. A CEO could easily read the title of this article and decide to just bring everyone back to the office without thinking critically. But that doesn't mean we should do the opposite we should be arming ourselves with this information so we can know how to counter our boss's arguments to ensure we can get what we want.
"My ROFLCopter goes soi soi soi soi soi soi soi soi soi..." - Microsoft Sam
So worldview but I think I may be able to parse out his more generously.
Some people need a community with sports and bars and swearing and insults in order to open up. I'm a man and I don't feel that way myself, but it's good to remember not all people are the same.