this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
80 points (100.0% liked)

news

23359 readers
20 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wild that Elon Musk may have prevented a nuclear strike. Not really sure what to make of this since I don't trust anything he says.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This stuff is being written about like he's wretched for doing it but as far as I know Starlink's TOS specifically says it can't be used for weapons (Checked, " Starlink is not designed or intended for use with or in offensive or defensive weaponry.") so this is just melon enforcing contract terms (lol) in order to prevent starlink from being targeted by Russia. Pretty sure the Russians could plink his low orbit satellites out of the sky if they decided they were a threat.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

Losing an offensive because I violated the TOS of the software I was using for command and control.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Russians could plink his low orbit satellites out of the sky if they decided they were a threat.

Technically - yes. Realistically - doubt it. Might constitute an attack on USA, and amusingly Kremlin is just sane enough to try and avoid that (unlike certain others)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, shooting down Starlink satellites would be the worst case response. More likely Musk was worried about his companies being targeted by sanctions or bans if Starlink got sorted into the "military industrial complex" category

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It seems pretty clear that Russia has already found ways to jam their satellite terminals (no need to even shoot down their satellites) so it’s just a face saving move than to say Starlink has been rendered completely useless for military purpose.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shotwell didn't provide details on how SpaceX disrupted Ukraine's use of Starlink but said, "there are things that we can do to limit their ability to do that... there are things that we can do and have done."

Now I'm curious what did, if not simply turning it off like the title suggests

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Rate-limited in the middle of a firefight

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Drone warfare makes high ping bastards of us all

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But the truly galaxy brain move is in this article:

After CNN’s reporting, Musk reversed course, tweeting “the hell with it … we’ll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free.”

Gwynne Shotwell, Musk’s president at SpaceX, was livid at Musk’s reversal, according to Isaacson.

“The Pentagon had a $145 million check ready to hand to me, literally,” Isaacson quotes Shotwell as saying. “Then Elon succumbed to the bullshit on Twitter and to the haters at the Pentagon who leaked the story.”

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

lol out of uncountable amount of Ls from him this was literaly the only thing even remotely approaching a W and he caved anyway what a god damn loser.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Lmao he bought Twitter for an exorbitant markup, it’s hemorrhaging money, and then the blue checks bullied him into turning down free pentagon money.

Stay winning buddy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dumbest man alive, he became the richest man in the world by guzzling government money and he can't even grift the military? Truly pathetic

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I guarantee that Isaacson told Musk "Hey don't fuck this up we've got a 150 million dollar bag" and Elong still fumbled it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Neoliberals will call communism a failure while they entrust the victory against their mortal enemy in the hands of a unpredictable manchild who likes to LARP as an underdog against “the system” and “current thing”. Truly the smartest bunch of people.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Really? Has that stopped him before? Ya know, when Moskva got hit? When naval bases and ships in Sevastopol were getting swarm droned? Now he's suddenly worried?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm going to assume that the truth is that Starlink sucks and had an unrelated issue that prevented this drone strike from going forward.