this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
390 points (97.3% liked)

The Onion

4218 readers
612 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (1 children)

OMFG, I totally ate the onion for a minute.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

It's bc it said two, isn't it? If it had been more believable and just said one...

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This may be the onion now, but just wait until we end up needing extra sticks of RAM just for Chrome haha

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wait? Normal people are constantly buying an extra stick of ram because their browsers slow down too much.

We may not realize it’s a problem because the tech sphere (and especially the pc gaming sphere) is famous for overbuying. I used to frequent buildapc over on that other site and there are daily posts of people asking if their RTX 3060, 10th gen i5, and 16gb of ram is good enough for basic gaming and getting told no “actually you need at least a 4070, 13th gen i9, and 32gb of ram just to be low end!”

Hell, I used to be a frequent commenter on lowendgaming and would constantly have to butt heads with gamers who believed that a 4060 ti was low end.

It’s an unhealthy mindset that a lot of pc powerusers have that makes it impossible for them to engage reasonably with articles like this because they simply cannot wrap their heads what is actually normal in the world of pc users. /endrant

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I dunno. If someone's building a PC, they are most probably using it for more than just chrome-level stuff. And for me at least, if I'm going to spend the time and money on new components, I'm going to get the biggest and best that I can afford/justify. The higher end comments are going to fair much better as tech develops further along, and I consider them an investment into not going through the same process again in just a few years time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Right, and some people built a PC and bought high end gear 10 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nobody did it so its a duty. Use Firefox people

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can someone ELI5 why chrome is such a fucking memory hog ?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

As someone who develops web apps for a living...probably all the shitty websites / apps out there.

Product doesn't care about optimizations, they care about speed to market / customer. That means I also have to not care, so all the code is janky AF and full of nice O(n^2) or worse algos and keeping shit tons (hundreds...thousands...tens of thousands...) of full 100+ data point payloads in memory even though the app only needs one tiny field from it. etc. etc.

Also all that telemetry. Yum.

I recently learned my friend works at a company that has telemetry in their web app that screenshots the page and sends back what the user is doing every 3 seconds or something. As well as the current state of the app. It lets developers rewind/replay situations for debugging. But the sheer amount of data captured and sent over the wire blew my mind.

edit: Sorry ELI5...lots of sites are suboptimal in design and hold on to or track a lot more than is actually needed for proper functionality. Couple that with telemetry that either Google or the web app itself wants to gather on everything you do and you're in for a bad time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Jeez and I thought I was sloppy. It's equal parts malice and incompetence

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

It's partly that. But also a lot of it is Google Chrome tends to just use a lot of RAM anyway. If you go into settings and actually limit the amount of ram it can have it's normally not a problem as long as it's not limited too much which means it doesn't actually need as much as it takes.

And it does give up RAM when it's required. It just likes holding on to it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Ah ok thanks.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

Holy fuck the ads on that site make it nearly impossible to read

Edit: on Firefox on Android*... It's atrocious

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

You're using Firefox without unlock origin?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You need a new video card.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I need a new graphics card to read about the new graphics card I need 👍

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Are you not using an ad blocker?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's a funny article I'd like to share to my friends but there's no way I'm going to send someone into that mess

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What mess? All I see is s clean ad free page.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok I'm sure it's fine on desktop but I'm using Firefox on Mobile and it looks like this

There's like three ads at a time and the ad at the bottom literally puts blue bars around the edges of the article. I'm just blown away by how shitty and intrusive it is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You can use add-ons in Firefox for Android. Not sure what version you're running (I'm on 125.2.0) and I can use many extensions:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/ublock-origin/ should directly let you add or remove the extension.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Thank you, didn't know this and it works great

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

Try AdGuard. It's an ad blocker for Android (using a local VPN sinkhole). Article is ad-free for me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Wow thats 600 dollars per extra tab not worth it