this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
139 points (95.4% liked)

politics

18883 readers
4483 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Kyrsten Sinema is spending more than $100,000 a month on personal security, barely raising money, and shelling out for first-class plane tickets—after railing against first class.

Once upon a time, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) crusaded against politicians cashing in on perks of their office.

In 2018, as a U.S. House member and Senate candidate, Sinema co-wrote a bill seeking to crack down on lawmaker use of public funds for “first class air travel,” among other luxuries.

“Arizonans are sick and tired of seeing Washington bureaucrats use their hard-earned tax dollars for personal gain,” Sinema said in a constituent email from July 2018, citing “private luxury travel” specifically.

Now, as Sinema reportedly considers whether to run for another term in 2024, it’s hard to overstate the degree to which she has become a caricature of the type of politician she once bashed.

On Monday, The Daily Beast reported on Sinema’s unusual spending of $210,000 in taxpayer funds on private chartered air travel since 2020—a practice that she herself had tried to ban just six years earlier.

But if Sinema pushes the envelope on her use of public funds, her latest campaign finance filings reveal her comfort with spending donor money on just about any perk under the sun—stays at five-star European hotels, luxury vehicles, first-class airfare, and splurges at plush West Coast vineyards.

On top of all of that, Sinema’s personal security expenses carry a staggering burn rate of more than $100,000 a month, most of it to one person—Tulsi Gabbard’s sister.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 56 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Fuck this evil piece of trash. Can't wait to never hear about this scum again. She'll never win another election, that's for sure.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Sinema was living the luxury life on campaign donations

https://youtu.be/5DeX3e4Vnz0

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

Time to cash out, her friends in Moscow are calling her home.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

Man…she is such a disappointment. I was excited when she won but never thought she’d be this bad.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

$100,000 a month on personal security... lol. She knows everybody hates her.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Its going to Russian asset Tulsi Gabbards sister.

More like a 100k/month kick back from campaign funds that will get reimbursed under the table.

Shes just money laundering election funds.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

As much as I would hate it, I’d consider strategically voting against her, definitely in a primary election, for sure in a general election just to get rid of her. Fuck her.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

I thought she pulled out from running as a Democrat because she knows she would lose.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Oh, Sinema, where you gonna run to?
Sinema where you gonna run to?
Where you gonna run to?
All on that day.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Can't stand her. Good riddance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

She is the perfect example of how every person that runs for any sort of government position is just seeking power and money. There are no good politicians.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

I like Sanders and Swalwell and the Crew.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

There are good politicians, they just stay out of the limelight. Both Oregon senators are great. Whitehouse is awesome.