this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
680 points (97.8% liked)

News

22876 readers
4157 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 180 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They threaten/shit down the government every other issue... Like a toddler having a tantrum.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

shit down the government

I don't know if this was a typo, but it's rather appropriate either way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 139 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The rest of America should follow Oregon's standards.

When Republicans walked out, Oregon said Bye Felicia.

Oregon high court says 10 GOP state senators who staged long walkout can’t run for reelection.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Walkouts allow a relatively small number of lawmakers to nullify the will of the majority, and that is to the detriment of our democracy,” Alejandro Queral, executive director of the Oregon Center for Public Policy, said in an emailed statement.

There it is. Being a shithead should cost you.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

100%. Also fine them for one months salary every time they play this "I just won't do my job 🤷‍♂️" game. Dont wanna work, dont get paid.

Unfortunately they all live off corporate kickbacks more than salary but at least some of that can be returned to the coffers.

[–] [email protected] 126 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Do it, yah fucking whinny-ass man-child.

Shut the fucking government down because you’re afraid of fucking democracy.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think "fucking democracy" is their end goal here.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pretty sure that’s how you catch liberty… and they think it’s an std

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dems need to draw a line in the sand here and do some of the campaigning on this

"They are so afraid that they would rather shut down government than allow votes"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I suspect the redhats would just interpret the votes being blocked were for "illegals" and that this was a good thing. Because they've been told this repeatedly.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The Republicans are trying to prevent college students from voting with this bill.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I said it last shutdown but does nobody seem to notice that whenever we have a shutdown it's because Republicans keep shitting their pants and then screaming about the smell?

Every govt shutdown in my lifetime has been because of Republicans. These shutdowns impact millions of people yet I never see it brought up.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They have extremely effective propaganda (fox) that just claims the exact opposite every time it happens and slightly more than half of the country’s land (not people) believe it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Republicans choose conservatism over democracy, and they lose the more people vote.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don’t think they are conservatives, although they call themselves that. Democrats are conservatives.

Classic conservatives conserve: this is a mob who could not individually list one thing they want to keep from changing. They want as much change that makes them the most money

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Preservation of an existing thing and conservative political ideology aren't actually linked. No matter how much conservatives try to tell you they are. Classic Conservatism was just how 17th and 18th century political philosophers referred to monarchies and top down systems that impose order on the masses. This was in opposition to Classical Liberalism which was a bottom up imposition of order. I.e. by the people, for the people.

In many ways the South came out of the revolution still subscribed to classical conservatism. They favored a heavy class system, different rules for the elite and workers, and were loathe to expand voting beyond the elite. Even after the civil war they made the antebellum period their golden age. It wasn't until the post world war 2 era offered Neo-Liberalism that they really gave up trying to go back to the antebellum period. There were even slave-like conditions called peonage right up to the mid 1940s.

One of the biggest differences in classical conservatism and liberalism was what they called, the state of nature. Liberals saw all men as inherently good, but taught to be evil by oppression and stressful environmental factors. Conservatives saw all men as inherently evil and in need of strong control. Their theories followed pretty well from those base assumptions. Although there was also a healthy dose of Divine Rule in conservatism.

I'm mentioning this because I hope everyone reading this can realize the Republicans of the cold war, as racist and hateful as they were, were still inside classical liberalism. They still believed in democracy, rule by the people, for the people. Since the end of Bush's presidency though they've increasingly decided classical conservatism is more attractive.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. Lets shut down the government over this. The furloughed workers totally won’t vote democrat in protest.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's worked every other time Republicans have shut down the government. Why wouldn't they get their way this time?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democrats should just threaten to shut down the government unless republicans suck Donald Stumps dick in response. Super easy, next question

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

Who you kidding, they'll form a line to do it.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

let the gov shutdown, lets see those stock prices tumble. You'd never get a better chance to let republicans shoot their own donors in the dick. Lets see spacex stop getting checks, stop paying the supreme court. The rule they're using to "shut down" the government is likely unconstitutional anyway.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The shutdown would be triggered by Congress not passing a funding bill, something that's happened 3 times since 2013, and the supreme would continue to get paid if this happens.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-judiciary-can-keep-operating-2-weeks-if-government-shuts-down-2023-09-19/

It seems like the supreme court staff would all be furloughed though. Could probably cut power to the buildings too. With a little creativity they could certainly create a situation where the supreme court stops getting paid and there is no way to convene the court to deal with it.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please shut the government down... please, please, please... while your party controls a mere one half of one of a branch of the government, please shut the government down during an election cycle. Please, please, please do it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maggots don't care and they will blame the Democrats for the shutdown

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

I was debating my father in 2020 about voting and said we should make voting laws "better." He countered that different parties might have different definitions of "better." I said, "easier and more accessible." He had no counter.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I say call their obvious bluff.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not convinced it's a bluff. As an outsider looking in, I'm going to tell you how I see this sort of situation.

The Republicans have embraced the Trump way of just accepting you're the bad guy, knowing your diehards will vote for you anyway. Whereas the Democratic members and voters expect responsibility from their party leaders.

So in a shutdown, the Republicans lose nothing, and the Democrats can lose everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

If you haven't already, follow Jeff Jackson while he's still in his position. He tells it how it is and gives inside info on why they make these futile plays

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Could shutting down the government somehow be an election stealing tactic by Republicons? How would that impact the government's ability to ensure fair elections.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The elections are run by the states, not the federal government. Congress keeps working during a shutdown. I can't see how it would hinder the election.

It would have unpredictable effects on the election though, so I can't imagine they really want to risk it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Cure this by actually voting. Fire these fuckers!

You can! NOW!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Johnson plans to pair a bill funding the government for six months with a Republican bill called the “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act” or “SAVE Act,” that would require new voters to submit “documentary proof of United States citizenship,” such as a passport or a birth certificate, in order to register to vote.

That doesn't seem like an outrageous ask but then access to such documents should also be safeguarded, that is if the actual reason was just to prevent voter fraud/illegally voting

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

This usually places undue burden on women, poor and generally anybody not a white dude.

Say you are a woman, okay you've got your certified copy of your birth certificate $10-but wait the name doesn't match because you got married.

Now you need a marriage certificate, thats another $10 and the trouble of contacting another municipal office.

Oh were you married twice? Thats tracking down another 2 municipal offices, another $10 marriage cert and now a certified judgement of divorce which will cost-ooh was your children's custody agreement a part of that? $40. Did you not remember your divorce file number from 30 years ago? It'll be an additional $5 per name per every 2 years searched.

I've seen women spend like $200 just on certified copies to get a realID driver's license. Has a chilling effect on registering, to solve a problem of voter fraud that doesn't really exist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What issue is it trying to solve? To my knowledge electoral fraud is so extremely rare in general (article cites figures in the double digits since 2000) let alone non-citizen voting, what this is though is anti-voter legislation, part of their election denial bullshit

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

What issue is it trying to solve?

Votes for Democrats. The Republicans have been using voter suppression tactics to get elected for decades. At this point it's the only way they can cling onto power.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mitch McFuckingDemonTurtle is against forcing this through now?

What universe is this!? I didn't wake up in the good timeline, Trumpism still exists, but I'll take one slightly good thing I guess!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

McTurtle cares about only 1 thing, power. He is nothing if not shrewd. The man would sell his wife out as a chinese spy if he thought it woild give the GOP an edge

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

RealID for all. Free at point of service. Do it at the post office right next to the Postal Banking window.

Done and done.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I have always thought that the American voting system is... Odd? I read you need to register every now and then in order to be able to vote? In Mexico we all get an ID issued by the federal government as you turn 18, and it is valid for pretty much anything, including voting. It is valid for years, you can vote as long as you have it on your possession. Updating your address or getting a reposition is free, and we even now allow Mexicans living abroad ( undocumented or not) to vote.

Granted, the system is not perfect, but I believe an important part of a democracy is to make participating in it as convenient as possible.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup, it's interesting how so many of these universal ID for voting laws don't also include an easy, convenient, and free means for all citizens to get IDs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Let them do it, and make sure everyone knows why.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Give us what we want or we'll shit in the pool and ruin it for everybody."

load more comments
view more: next ›