this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
907 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

10348 readers
2284 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Now I am curious, somebody explain. if it just stopped burning, would we know after 8 mins, if we lived on the opposite side?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Moon would "disappear" when it no longer reflected Sun's light.

It would also start getting very cold fast

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

It would probably take more than a day for the cold to be so intense that you can't possibly explain with some normal local phenomenon.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

The moon might be on the daylight side, so we wouldn't necessarily observe that.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any visible planet or asteroid would. So some stars would also appear to blink out, but those would take longer to blink out. So the moon would go after 8 minutes, Jupiter would take 43 minutes to stop receiving light, and another 35-52 minutes to disappear for earth depending on orbital locations.

Presumably we would get something on radio/tv/internet from the side facing the sun once they realized it, that of course being only if they hadn't already been eradicated by a horrific shockwave caused by whatever event caused the sun to vanish before they had a chance to report what they saw, because supernovae tend to travel at very close to the speed of light, so there wouldn't be much time for them to react.

And if this is a supernova, you might just have time to grok what happened before the planet was obliterated under your feet from the shockwave.

So I guess... chances are we would just barely understand what happened before we were gone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s kind of odd that it doesn’t matter for a single human whether they die from sudden car accident or get obliterated by supernova. Both events feel equal

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Does heat travel at the speed of light? I just realized I have no idea how the heat from the sun travels to earth.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

The "heat" IS the radiation. So, yes.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Someone correct me if I'm missing some nuance here, but heat doesn't get transferred directly through space because heat is vibrating molecules and space is a vacuum. The sun radiates (speed O' light). A lot of that radiation just reflects off the earth (or we wouldn't be able to see it), but a lot of it gets absorbed. THAT's when it's converted into heat energy. It's also why the greenhouse effect is a global phenomena: light energy comes in across the vacuum relatively easily, turns to heat on Earth instead of being reflected, heat energy cannot escape as easily as light energy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Neat! Thanks for sharing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Infrared light is absorbed quite easily, producing heat, and the sun emits a lot of it. Of course, all photons that are absorbed and not reflected will produce thermal energy, and infrared radiation is commonly referred to as radiant heat. The other two heat transfer methods are conduction and convection, which requires a medium to transfer through.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When there is a total solar eclipse, the temperature does drop dramatically. But it might not be detectable on the other side right away for sure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It does! And if you're in a place where night animals are noisy, they get noisy for the length of "dusk", totality, and "dawn"!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, we have conduction, convection, and radiative heat transfer. Vacuum insulates the first two, it's the light from the sun that heats us up

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

It wouldn’t really be faster than normal nighttime cooling. However, that cooling would continue instead of having the sun to start warming stuff up in the morning.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

It takes 8 minutes for the light to travel from the sun to Earth. Because light in a vacuum travels faster than anything, including information, we would not and could not know it had disappeared for 8 minutes. This means Earth would continue to follow its orbit around a non-existent sun for 8 minutes because the Sun’s gravity would still be acting on the Earth.

If it was nighttime, you wouldn’t notice the sudden lack of sunlight (other than if it was a full moon) but you’d almost certainly notice the change in gravity.

Edit: actually, you wouldn’t feel any difference in gravity or experience any change of acceleration. What you would experience is a very tiny vibration, of 1 million push notifications being sent to your phone from the other side of the planet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Interesting, so you are saying light is faster than gravity?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

light speed = gravity speed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From an AI, so take with some salt:

Yes, gravity is believed to travel at the speed of light.

According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, the effects of gravity propagate through spacetime at the speed of light. This means that if a massive object were to suddenly change its position, the gravitational effects would not be felt instantaneously by objects around it, but would instead spread outward at the speed of light.

This is in contrast to the classical Newtonian view of gravity, which treated it as an instantaneous force. Einstein's theory showed that gravity, like other forms of electromagnetic radiation, obeys the speed limit set by the speed of light.

Experimental evidence, such as observations of binary pulsars, has confirmed that gravity does indeed propagate at the speed of light, as predicted by general relativity. This is a crucial aspect of our modern understanding of the nature of gravity and its relationship to the fabric of spacetime.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don't think you'd actually "notice" the gravity.

Earth would still retain it's mass, and we're much closer to it, so it's lesser mass acts much more on us than the sun's greater.

Though, the earth would stop orbiting the sun and ~~travel on a mostly tangential path~~ travel nearly radially away from where the sun was, instead of the elliptical path it currently travels.

This is a very interesting physics question that I may look into further. Specifically what would the theoretical acceleration be, due to the lack of the sun? Is it above a humans level of perception?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Gravitysimulator.org has an interface you can simulate what happens, though it's timeframe is on the order of days. Not seconds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Why would it travel radially away? The resulting gravity wave from a disappearing stun much push the Earth a little, but changing its orbit that drastically would mostly destroy Earth anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

you’d almost certainly notice the change in gravity.

Really? can you actually percieve the sun gravity? Do you mean that we would get like a tsunami beause of the tidal effect? Now I kinda want a documentary about this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's weird to say that light travels faster than information, because light is information. In other words, top speed for information IS speed of light.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I think that's just the wording. My interpretation of that is any satellite or space probe sending back readings to Earth wouldn't be faster than the sun visually disappearing from the sky. Even with the information being transmitted at the speed of light, there's always going to be some sort of processing delay, along with the limited bandwidth of the transmission.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Yes, because of the medium of communication you are using right now.