Technology

58140 readers

5404 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

614

Cable lobby vows “years of litigation” to avoid bans on blocking and throttling (arstechnica.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

88 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Good, let them use their money on litigation instead of lobbying.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Yup, I'm all for it. Put it in a ballot and we'll vote to enshrine it into law.

One of my general rules of thumb is: if cable companies are for it, it must suck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean maybe they decided it was going to be easier to buy a judge than another FCC chair?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Are there any past examples of companies getting out of fines that way? Even Facebook had to pay 20Bn, you would think they could have gotten a judge for only 15 if it were so easy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of examples of companies challenging the legality of regulations and winning, and other cases of apparent corruption among judges.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Yes I was asking you to present one case in which an FCC ban or fine was avoided with the courts.