this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
324 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

34438 readers
244 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My concerns beyond that are that it would force what kind of porn you watch to be traceable. And just because what you like is legal now doesn’t mean it’ll stay that way. Stuff like sadomasochism that’s already controversial as heck all the way to stuff like gay porn. If such things become illegal I don’t trust that “it was legal at the time” will be seen as a good defense.

And beyond that the “warning” they were ordered to put up is blatantly false and fucked up

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

And even if it is legal, you probably don't want that information to be made public when the site inevitably has a breach.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agreed. If not for the fact that these laws are obviously just a gateway to more porn restrictions, I'd support a strict pornography age verification. But because it's coming from only the far right conservative group, I know where things will end up if we give an inch. As for your porn being traceable, it already is. Your ISP/VPN sees all of your internet traffic, and you'd be a fool to think that the government doesn't have access to that info.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your isp doesn't know it's you. It could be anyone on your network. And if you have to identify yourself the government gets involved right away

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And I don't want them to assume that it's an adult, because I have young kids at home. I also don't want them to be able to inspect packets to look for an authorization token or something, because that means my traffic isn't secure.

I hate everything about this. If they force verification, I will be installing a VPN for my household to a place that doesn't require it, because I'd rather my kids watch porn than reveal personally identifiable information online. I trust my kids a lot more than I trust websites.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a big difference between identifying yourself to a neutral ISP versus identifying yourself to the government. In general, I'm not that skeptical of government, but this is one issue where I worry about the right wing loonies getting their way. God help us if it's ever criminalized

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@ssorbom @PP_BOY_ Banning porn would probably cause a lot of growth in porn over Tor / ActivityPub though. So that’d be a positive that would come from such a situation.