Yes.
toomanypancakes
Considering all the links posted in the last circlejerk thread were dismissed out of hand as "pro vegan" I'm not surprised nobody is wasting their time here.
Not sure the people arguing against this are aware how much corn, rice, soy, and supplemental taurine is in the meat based foods they give their cats already anyway, so it hardly seems worthwhile to go back to square one every fifth post.
"Not my opinion = bad"? As opposed to the vegan bad circle jerks you spawned with two separate stickied posts due to your emotional outbursts that the entire admin team has allowed to fester? You're right, vegans are definitely the problem.
Cats are carnivorous, which is why I feed mine a steady diet of filet mignon. Nothing but the best for my snookums!
Haha sorry, it's definitely sarcasm. I'm just tired of people who have no idea what they're talking about using any opportunity to try to dunk on vegans with the same old tired arguments we've heard and refuted to deaf ears hundreds of times before. It gets real old.
Well, animal abuse is okay as long as it's done to an animal you don't care about. That's just the circle of life.
Exactly, you approve of animal abuse when you want to eat them, and oppose it only when you don't. It's a violent, sickening, and childish outlook. Goodbye.
Simplest answer is if you eat meat, you don't give a fuck about animal abuse. You care about pet abuse, and only just enough so you don't have to research it or try. If you liked kitten steaks you wouldn't care what they were being fed because circle of life, bro. Keep on dumping meow mix into your little chonk's food bowl and telling yourself how moral you are, you brave ethical champion you.
I could probably take down two, but when the third enters the picture I'm toast
I checked with hubs too and he thinks he could handle forty while wearing jeans and good boots