stembolts

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Amelie's, Charlotte, NC. Used to go there all the time at night. 24/7 bakery, lounge, student study area.

The original building was torn down, which is sad, but I'll always have the memories.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yes, similar to the web of trust, there exists a web of trust for people based on reputation. Journalistic integrity, openness, scrutiny; these are just a few of the things that go away when experts go away.

People who dedicate their lives to truth should be recognized as such, and those who lie should be recognized as well. Outsourcing your information gathering to "randoms" just means that you will be swayed by whoever can afford the best bot farm.

And if you think you are unswayable, you are the perfect target.

Follow those who express curiosity, welcome questioning, and conduct themselves in good faith. It's an iterative process, you don't have to resolve it in a day.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

It is a great time saver, the confederate flag serves a similar purpose.

It says, "I can't wait to be disagreeable to you if you aren't on my team."

Occasionally I end up in the homes of one of these people, I keep to myself, keep everything professional and nothing more, yet they'll prod at you to try to figure out what you think, aka "Are you on my team or are you the enemy?" It's so exhausting. I just play dumb until I can get away.

Headphones are great for this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I am kinda done with conversations where the respondee ignores everything said then repeats a baseless subjective response that obviously reflects their personal bias. You are only talking to yourself, there is no interaction occuring between you and I. Nonetheless I'll reply once more and provide you with more questions that you will give no thought to. Maybe share a SpongeBob meme this time, people like SpongeBob memes.

I am aware of no publicly enforceable policy on child rearing outside of social services, which is poorly funded. Are you able to define, globally, for all parents the definition of what causes a child to be raised "right"? It's rhetorical, of course you can't because no one can.

Bringing up the parents and playing "the blame game" is inevitably going to lead us to a discussion about social support programs to help struggling families. However to me your comments seem like lazy concern trolling, you are "greatly concerned" about the parents, yet I assume will oppose all programs to help make their childrearing easier.

So let's test my theory, since you are concerned about the parents involved, which social programs do you feel should be expanded in order to help those families?

But that is a bit of a hard question, I suggest ignoring everything I asked you and pasting a one-liner question, similar to how you replied to my previous comment. Lazy. Predictable. Boring.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I disagree. Setting aside my feelings on the policy, a behavior occurred, a policy was enacted, a behavior was changed. Making it objectively a policy issue.

Your desire for it not to be a policy issue seems to be the driving factor for why you don't think it's a policy issue. Seems like circular reasoning.

Maybe I'm missing something though, I'm open to elaboration on why curtailing misbehavior on public grounds with a policy is not a policy issue.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (7 children)

the words honestly are confusing. i can admit that. out of context "drag queen" would mean nothing to me either.

as i understand it, a drag queen is someone (usually a man?) who dresses up in flamboyant clothing of the opposite gender and takes on a character, like a stage identity, and everyone's stage identity is individual to themselves. from what I've seen, the stories behind a stage identity are often as interesting as the costumes themselves, which can be very intricate and eye catching.

drag queen competitions can feature singing, dancing, showmanship, acrobatics, comedy, and are a good time, check one out if you get a chance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I must have been tired, not sure why I was aggressive, my bad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Nope, just relatively. Though how do you want to define consciousness could change my nope to a yes. It's all about the definition.

All I can see when I read this comment is a plaque to blind confidence. Don't take it the wrong way, I don't mean it as a wholly a bad thing.. maybe 90% bad, 10% admiration. Confidence is powerful, but it works best when paired with other traits.

..but back to the thread, unless you're involved in this topic at an academic level, can you explain the reasoning behind the confidence you appear to have in your perspective?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I didn't see what the family was compensated for the bracelet in the article. Would seem odd to me if there is zero compensation.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 weeks ago (23 children)

Another one bites the dust.

I admit it, I once assumed Elon was a genius.
(events happen)
Okay, not a genius, but a good businessman.
(events happen)
Okay, a bad businessman, a good PR person.
(events happen)
Okay, a bad PR person, but not a Nazi.
(events happen)
Well fuck, he's a Nazi supporting conspiracy theorist.

God damn, if I was that wrong about one person. I'm just gonna stop having opinions about famous people. It's all smoke and mirrors.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
303
Kira (programming.dev)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
47
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Edit : I appreciate all the PoVs and I will reply to everyone. This is important to me. Just going to go rest a bit and I'll be back.

Edit : Leaving the self-insulting language in, but yeah.. Point taken, I should stop being so mean to myself. And to add another FYI, I've been on this codebase for about 3 months, which I probably should have mentioned.

I have no idea what is wrong with me. I get tasks, I work on them, they NEVER seem to close. Meanwhile everyone around me is left and right solving their issues. I reach out for a second opinion because I must just be stupid, and every time I reach out the person is never able to assist in any meaningful way.

It's like my tasks always have blockers that everyone around me seems perplexed by, I get a lot of, "Wow, that's crazy," or, "Yeah your job does seem to have a lot of unusual blockers."

I'm at the point where I'm in a daily meeting where I explain what I'm working on to a senior dev because obviously they noticed I'm a person on the team with sometimes zero points in a whole month. It's so discouraging to have to go to a daily meeting because apparently I'm stupid? The thing is, when I explain what I'm blocked by, every person has said, "Oh weird, this seems like a really confusing task." Or, "Damn I've never seen anything like that."

So obviously I look at other peoples' tasks.. what are they working on? And their tasks are SO simple and straightforward, yet I've NEVER had a task like that, all my tasks were opened years ago, remained open for months or years, then were assigned to me. And they're all fucky. Wth.

Tbh I'm running out of things to write because I don't want to justify it, because I feel like I should be doing better. What the hell is wrong with me?

I have wanted to change jobs for close to two years now.. but you've all interacted with recruiters.. they never help, and job search is impossible as a person with anxiety and possibly autism?

I love coding, I hate my coding environment.. Anyone else ever have this type of issue in programming?

view more: next ›