Vncredleader

joined 4 years ago
 

I knew this story from the Dollop but they really made a joke out of most of it, building to the "religion is silly" punchline without much further to take away. I love this video for really digging into mid 19th century american radicalism. Spear is essentially advocating for utopian communism, was friends with Garrison, put his life on the line for the abolition of slavery, and fought for the rights of prisoners above all else.

Reminds me a lot of the utopian stuff Matt Christman loves to discuss. These people who fully believed they could save humanity, who saw acutely the same suffering Marx did, but took a different path. Much like Robert Owen, who Spears quotes at one point, he is still worthy of respect and analysis.

almost every single like modern account of john spear, every time you hear him being talked about it's as a joke right. He's almost always being you see the phrase "new england's dr frankenstein" or calling him frankenstein or some kind of madman all the time. Right that's all, that's the only way he's ever talked about now and you know i can't myself tell you that the guy was all there right; of course i can't and i can't tell you though some of the stuff i've been reading you isnt a little bit amusing right, but at the end of the day it may be funny to think "oh look at that crazy guy walking up the hill with that machine he thinks he's going to bring life to it he thinks it's going to be his new electric baby" right but you know what john speer thought when he was going up that hill?

He thought that he was going to save the world he thought that he was going to create a new society for all of us that was completely just this was a man who who has seen the absolute ugliest depravity of human society he has been assaulted threatened everything he has seen horrors that most of us will never see right can you really look a man like that in the eyes a man who has devoted his life to helping others and laugh at him i don't think so he john spear was trying to create a free limitless source of energy and power for him for his kids for his kids kids for you for me for our kids for everybody for all time and now 150 years later all we can really do is wish that it had worked

Of course I would say we CAN make that work, but not through his new motive power. We can do it by living up to even half the shit he did in life, and fighting to make that world. I think part of that nuttiness comes from seeing such depravity and seeing how little people give a shit. It makes you either break down, look for a divine source to fix things, or be John Brown and be that divine source yourself and grab a machete.

 

Insanely well done video essay on "modern" retellings and the subgenera of feminist retellings of Greek myths. Really respectful towards these modern writers, but she gives a fantastic classicist perspective and explores how often Anglo culture uses Greek myths and history as a plaything.

Really beautifully done and a good examination of HOW we approach mythology and how oversimplifications can erase the actual depth of stories.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

A tribe in the region. Though Yahweh is not from the Levant or Egypt, seems he arrives in Egypt from farther east

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

iirc they are a tribe of Canaanites and eventually win out. There is a theory that they practiced Monolatry, the worship of a singular god, but without denying the existence of other deities. The Dead Sea Scrolls mention many sons of Elohim and make mention to the gods of other nations, which are defeated by El. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Kpkp2vxX3I

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's not really a culture of colonizers even during the height of Ancient Erin. A possible analog for a past group that very well could be a stand-in for inter proto-Irish conflicts as much as inter Gaelic ones is so tenuous at best. Most cultures have something like this, and it would be tantamount to saying there was an inherent colonial culture in the Ho-Chunk people because the Wąge-rucge man-eaters might be a cultural memory of another tribe their ancestors fought against.

There is a world of difference between human migration and conflicts arising therein and what we would identify as colonialism. Why even bring it up as such? Plus the Tuatha De Danann from even a quick search seem to be theorized to be Gaelic gods recontextualized into a post-Christianization culture. So it is literally not even from a culture of colonizers, but the reformatting of their own beliefs to a context of a cultural conversion. They seem to have come to mean "folk" or people much later and originally the term implied godliness. And then there is the PIE stuff and war between gods with humans in the middle which is foundational to a ton of places meaning it could either be remnants of a way more ancient myth shared with the Vedic and Norse etc, or a recontextualization of unique traditions subconsciously along the same lines as more eastern Europeans and Indo-European cultures. Least that's how I view the Iliad elements in Irish myth, maybe a shared tradition or more likely later writers put characters and stories into a structure they already knew, ie the most recited myth in Europe.

We really need to be careful with history and modern terminology/conceptions. Cultures did not really remove one another necessarily, nor can we accurately talk about Bronze-Age and earlier cultures in strictly defined terms. We use names given to types of pottery we find to describe a general human presence in a large area across thousands of years. It is broad and ambiguous on purpose. Hell even more recent cases like the Germanic "colonization" of Celtic England is WAY more ambiguous than previous historians thought.

For that history and a good object lesson on how complicated human migration is to decode there is a great video by CambrianChronicles on Brythonic Britons and how they never disappeared https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FHRTpEhaAs

And that's not to say that there was not a colonization and resistance in that case, far from it. There we have a material understanding of both cultures that can be defined even if the lines between the people of them is nonexistent in a practical sense. CambrianChronicles has several videos including one I LOVE on Arthur that drive home how originally Welsh/Briton Arthur was essentially a propaganda character for anti-imperialist movements. My point is the distinctions quickly disappear and framing there as being such a thing as "culture of colonizers" in a time when people hardly if at all identified themselves as having a culture is silly, applying it as far back as the etymological history and patchwork shifts in linguistic groups of the Bronze age is downright ahistoric. Especially with Celts, the very definition of which is hotly debated.

Another good POV is the short but wonderful history of the Bronze Age Collapse "1177: the year civilization ended" which shows some amazing research on how crises cause mass migration and why old models of how ancient Greeks came to Greece are pretty off base, with what was thought to be an invasion from the west by the Dorians might've been large refugee movements from Asia Minor which coincided with populations from Mycenean Greece fleeing eastward due to their problems. Heck the Sea Peoples are very possibly a phenomenon of various refugee crises and/or desperate moves by kingdoms we know for sure about trying to stay alive during what must've felt like an apocalypse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

My phone pushed that this morning, made me laugh. They are so divorced from reality but still have to catch up to it sometimes. It is so flagrant you end up catching yourself for a sec

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Horrorfying. I only just found out about this when hearing that my family there is thankfully ok.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Its so good. My game is fucked tho, my screen flickers and has the worst graphical glitches i've ever seen if I open the menu during a mission. I am glad I beat the game before this started

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn't TOTK born out of some mechanics they originally planned as DLC but needed to expand on? Maybe I am wrong, but I do get the mindset of moving forwards. I do honestly hope for something not BOTW-esq soon, but without a handheld consol that seems unlikely

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After Legends we all know what we want more of. Though would be nice to get something spin-off oriented again

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would have rather a Let's Go Johto game for S&Vs spot so those could have a longer development time. Let's Go is such a good way to get older fans back in and showcase older games to younger kids

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Literally just conversations are "disinformation" fuck liberals dude. This shit makes me want to see them get their ivory towers destroyed and all their self-delusions come tumbling down. Dead kids in Donbas are not a rhetorical trick you sick fucking bastards. Human lives are just games for them. How do they not see how dystopian this shit is? How completely 1984 this looks to use their parlance

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought they did split in Fallout. The USSR is on friendlier relations with the US by the time the nukes drop

 
view more: next ›