NaevaTheRat

You seem familiar with this looking at the instance you run.

I'm keen to hear your thoughts on why these subsidies are harmful. What do you think is a better approach for pre-school aged childcare? Or do you not want it?

The state steralised me so I've no personal stake, by sister who's quite wealthy and very uh unradical feminist (more women as bank ceos type) seems very keen on this stuff for gender equality reasons given childcare often falls to mothers. Keen to hear the other side if you don't mind writing up your thoughts?

Dude wants like 0 tax and mah freedom. Look at his profile, what's wrong with teasing a random American who feels entitled to whinge about what a government half the world away is doing?

Seems like you'll hate it. I would've thought you'd prefer guns in school and no welfare because governments governing pisses you off.

Are you planning on coming back or do you just it just annoy you that the usa isn't the entire world?

You're a Yank loonie. Why are you here?

Pokémon let's go (to the star for a cheeky one) Eeve

Why?

Put aside your nostalgia for the game for a minute. Wouldn't it be better if the game didn't feature the slot machines? They're

a) not important mechanically, narratively, or artistically.

b) presenting something socially harmful and addictive with absolutely zero context as to those harms.

c) Potentially some of a generation's earliest exposure to gambling, and presented as an annodyne game with some mechanical benefits to playing.

The goal isn't to keep Pokémon out of the hands of kids, it's to encourage people to not include this stuff in children's games. Imagine if you could just light a ciggy at some point in the game to give your Pokémon 5 experience points or whatever, it's a completely gratuitous and possibly harmful.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/4593645

chemists live longer because all the poisons are fighting each other.

Industry pressure is my guess. Easier to start with the "nuh dah" examples than get caught in the lootboxes == slots legal battles.

Payoff is longer than 3 years so it won't happen.

I think sometimes when I try to point out that political violence underpins much of society people hear "violence is good actually".

It's frustrating because what I'm trying to point out is actually the opposite. Prostrating yourself lets other people use violence with no checks.

you can criticise the world without resorting to past = bad which often hides things we have lost.

Also oats are nutritious, delicious, and efficient.

How about pointing out how hard you work to afford food that is often thrown out lest it undermine keeping you slaved to "the economy" etc.

No actually I'm not done. Wanting fewer material things is good actually. Opulence need not manifest in terms of the aquisition of territory and things. What if you have a tiny home and breakfast gruel but you get idle time, community, gorgeous views, freedom etc.

the problems with society aren't that you can't eat figs every meal and stroll around your estate, it's that mere subsitence demands your soul.