MachineFab812

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Shove my corpse on a random desert hillside and study its decomposition ... hyper-specific because there's actually study like so, but yeah, anything that isn't claimed by patients/doctors who need it, I want set out for sky "burial".

Now I think about it, I think I read that study wants entire corpses. Now I'm sad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Secret Service needed to find out if he had any sponsors, accomplices, handlers, whatever.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

No, jackass. People that can barely afford their pets often(not enough) realize they can't afford kids. Getting rid of the pets doesn't make having kids affordable. Its also a lot easier to figure out who gets the pets when relationships sour.

There's just so many reasons almost no one is "choosing" pets over kids.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

If you're willing to exploit nearly everyone you meet for free food and shelter, yes, yes it is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Came here to say this. It's also remarkably easy to mooch off extended family, friends, even strangers. People usually feed their couch-surfer guests as well, who knew?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Only while in use" counts when an app is allowed to run in the background as "in use". Allow push notifications? That app is running in the background.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Thirteen minutes ago, and you still haven't actually blocked me. Sounds about right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

One would hope, but no, so long as the Super-Intendent gets his kick-backs, this is the shit that takes priority over all-else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

THAT is a fucking masterpiece.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, no. You see, your suggestion is actually what I replied to every other person who commented that claptrap on this post. Its like, right there in my comment history. That specific commenter went so far as to outright claim those pics were THE stock configuration though, and theirs was the last such comment I replied to. They, and you, can actually, on second thought, fuck right off.

I opted to be even slightly civil with them. Maybe because like their username or I just had an off moment.

You? You made the mistake of assuming I was being, idk, sincere or some shit. No, I don't even actually hope or care that someone named "pm-your-nudes" even bothers to break character to make more truthful comments, so long as they're kinda-sorta called on it when they don't.

Stop being such an insincere-dumbfuck-persona-apologist. Getting people to realize "wow, I was almost fooled by this insincere shit-post-teir bullshit that failed to trip-up this man-bun-yoga-hipster dude" is exactly the shocked reader response I was going for. Welcome to peak internet. 2024 is the new 1994.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I've decided I want one, just because NO ONE will question whatever mods I choose to make to it. The questions about why I bought it in the first place will never cease, but why make it as close to a DeLorean time machine as a fucking "truck" can look? Not a peep.

... having come up with the BTF thing just for this comment, I've realized: Backwards, its actually a good fit. Shame about what it would do to road visibility.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Sure. Anywhere near as douchey as discrediting this community by spreading that garbage non-sense about what an F-750 actually is.

 
 

https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/9436237

@[email protected]
(replaced with my own user profile, as I'm not trying to fill other users' inboxes for no real reason)(also, this somehow worked right when making this post, but not the original comment)
[@[email protected]](/u/MachineFab812)
https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/9293054 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/9620373 https://jlai.lu/comment/6487794

While we're at it, am I missing at instance-agnostic method for linking posts as well?

view more: next ›