Lauchs

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -5 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Globally, they still are. Almost half the world doesn't have one. And children still lose their limbs mining the cobalt etc.

I guess the question could be better phrased as "and what are you personally giving up to ensure that as many people as possible are fed?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

Check at the state level. A few states have introduced ranked choice, your state may have someone in the mix trying to make it a thing where you live!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If people vote in the primaries for candidates who support ranked choice voting, then yes.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

Blorbius scrunklius is too perfect. After some 20ish rereads, I still have trouble supressing a seemingly involuntary giggle.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (21 children)

Why could it not replace an engineer?

The previous limits of technology exploded less than half a decade ago, seems wild to assume that's the end of that kind of growth.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (23 children)

Why?

A half decade ago we would've laughed at a machine passing the Turing test...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Sure, same but that kind of defeats the poiny of the whole exercise...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

I wish I could opt out of those messages. On streaming platforms that should be doable! (I really hate spoilers.)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To quote Greg Giraldo "Really? Is that good? How much worse could your real face look than that clown mask you've had welded to your head?!?"

(For those who don't know him, criminally underrated dead comedian at Joan River's roast.)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago

A casual reading of history will confirm that's kinda been our modus operandi for, uhhh, ever.

 

Apologies if gifs aren't allowed!

26
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Almost everyone agrees there should be more compromises in politics. So I'm curious, how would that play out?

While I love the policy debates and the nuances, most people go for the big issues. So, according to the party platforms/my gut, here's what I'd put as the 3 for each party:

Democrats: Abortion rights, gun control, climate change.

Republicans: Immigration, culture war (say, critical race theory in schools or gender affirming care for minors) , trump gets to be president. (Sorry but it really seems like a cult of personality at this point.)

Anyway, here's the exercise: say the other side was willing to give up on all three of their issues but you had to give up on one of your side's. OR, you can have two of your side's but have to give up on the third.

Just curious to see how this plays out. (You are of course free to name other priorities you think better represent the parties but obviously if you write "making Joe Pesci day a national holiday" as a priority and give it up, that doesn't really count.)

Edit: The consensus seems to be a big no to compromise. Which, fair, I imagine those on the Right feel just as strongly about what they would call baby murdering and replacing American workers etc.

Just kind of sad to see it in action.

But thanks/congrats to those who did try and work through a compromise!

 

Having large numbers of people starve to death seems like a pretty damning indictment of a system. But I dunno, maybe I'm overly attached to food?

 
 

Listened to Billie Jean while cleaning, wondered what the all time playlist might be.

I imagine Kanye, Clapton, Pink Floyd, James Brown, Ike Turner all make the cut with MJ but I'm curious what Lemmy comes up with!

 

Kind of amazing. In my head this is basically saying "we can't protect people in parts of downtown Vancouver and rather than change that, it may just be easier to abandon the area.

 

Crosspost from c/politics

 
 
 

Hi! I'm trying to figure out if my anti fat biases etc are colouring my view. Background: I've lived in an olderish apartment (1970s) for about a decade, got a new upstairs neighbour a couple of years ago and now my bathroom ceiling leaks, grows mold etc. The maintenance folks have cut through the drywall a few times, confirmed mold, replaced the pipes, checked and watched for leaks without luck.

My guess as to what's happening is that the bathtub is an older one and the new neighbour is really big (for a Canadian. Like, not infinifat or whatever but would definitely take up more than a seat in the movies or airplanes) and not just belly fat but quite wide as well. I can't imagine he can turn in the shower without the sheets coming out of the tub and spilling water all over the ground (and with our poor molding etc I could easily see it working its way down)

Unsure how to bring it up so I figured I'd check and see if that's even a thing that actually happens or if that's just my inherent anti fat assumptions going to work. I don't know anyone socially even close to his size so don't really know where else to ask.

 
view more: next ›