IrritableOcelot

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I use zettlr -- it's pretty good! The only issues I've run into are with the table editor, and with occasional lag on large documents; the latter just comes with the territory on an Electron app. I know Nathan's working on both, though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'm not familiar with fwupdmgr, so I'm not sure either about it delivering bios updates. A good tool to know about for sure, though!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I don't mean use the RSS feed to actually deliver, I just mean a blog-style announcement. Of course, to be security conscious you shouldn't follow any links in that announcement to download it, but still.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think I've ever gotten bios updates via apt...not sure if that's a laptop thing, a manufacturing thing, or what.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The latest blog post says it should be just a few days, which is nice!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I wasn't trying to call you out! I was more responding to Jcreazy, but I wanted to emphasize what NaN said.

As far as I know, the xapps are largely updated in line with when Mint gets updates -- Mint doesnt get super frequent updates on those either, they often get bundled with a new Cinnamon release.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah. Everyone should be clear that both Mint and LMDE follow about the same release spacing as their upstream, but offset by a couple of months. Mint's upstream is Ubuntu LTS, LMDE's is Debian. Both release about every two years. Mint and LMDE cannot possibly do major version updates faster than their upstream!

The point of these distros is stability and polish. If you want the absolute newest updates, mint/LMDE is not the right distro for you, and getting the newest updates inherently sacrifices some stability.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah! I only discovered them a couple of weeks ago through this community and they're fantastic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Specifically to make something which is not mission-critical reliant on any underlying software...but that's almost impossible. Not reliant on the base operating system would be a nice start.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

While it is true that the ad business model is changing as you describe, Google's strategy with respect to it is also absolutely about monopolizing the ad market.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I mean any technology solution can suffer the same fate, but you would hope that it wouldnt be an issue at the same time if they're separate tech stacks.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So all their products are breaking...

To be honest, I'm not sure if it would be more concerning for them to have just one fatal issue with their process, or two unrelated ones.

view more: ‹ prev next ›