DrQuint

MAKE PRODUCT AT LOSS

GET CAPITOL TO MAKE PRODUCT LOOK BIGGER

SELL PRODUCT FOR MORE THAN SPENT

FIRE EVERYONE TO "MAKE SUSTAINABLE" (LIE)

LEAVE WITH GOLDEN PARACHUTE

REPEAT TILL YOU CAN BUY ENOUGH PROPERTIES TO RAISE SHITHEAD KID WHO WILL RUIN YOUR FORTUNE

Don't even need to make it about code. I once asked what a term meant in a page full of a certain well known FOSS application's benchmarks page. It gave me a lot of garbage that was unrelated because it made an assumption about the term, exactly the assumption I was trying to avoid. I try to deviate it away from that, and it fails to say anything coherent and then loops back and gives that initial attempt as the answer again. I was stuck unable from stopping it from hallucinating.

How? Why?

Basically, it was information you could only find by looking at the github code, and it was pretty straightforward - but the LLM sees "benchmark" and it must therefore make a bajillion assumptions.

Even if asked not to.

I have a conclusion to make. It does do the code thing too, and it is directly related. Once asked about a library, and it found a post where someone was ASKING if XYZ was what a piece of code was for - and it gave it out as if it was the answer. It wasn't. And this is the root of the problem:

AI's never say "I don't know".

It must ALWAYS know. It must ALWAYS assume something, anything, because not knowing is a crime and it won't commit it.

And that makes them shit.

The equivalent community seeded on the site that starts with R and ends with eddit recently (a month ago) made it a rule that people can't make "therapy" posts which means people posting topics can't make them primarily about their grievances with personal time or with the industry. And the baseline quality of topics in that place went way higher.

I think there's a lesson to take from that: Try and not give a shit. Just find games you like, and play and talk about them. Make that the top priority, and make these concerns secondary - and you'll have a higher quality time with the hobby.

I personally have 0 idea why the news circles gave two weeks of attention to something like Suicide Squad. Game looked bad, reviewed bad, openly had manipulative features built in AND attached to update promises, and then releases and, whoa, turns out, surprise surprise, it IS bad. And yet, two weeks. Two weeks of random place just bringing up the bad game that is bad with a lukewarm stance. Fucking even Skill Up, which I avidly consume content of, gave it a whole hour of attention split across two weekly roundups. That is unhealthy. Games do NOT deserve attention just because they're marketed. And, in no way I can convinced of otherwise: It's objectively stupid to give it that. I just skipped any discussions related to it, will probably skip any discussion related to turtle rock, the studio, henceforth that doesn't start with "they made a return to form! XYZ is the best game they've made!" and my life feels unsurprisingly unaffected and I feel personally, unsurprisingly, less stupid.

Netorare, Cuckholdery. Basically an entire branch of porn where the plot has one man watch "his" woman be taken by another man. It's overdone in some circles and completely absent in others which makes me think there's some degree of turnoff associated with it that is cultural.

Manic Miner for the ZX Spectrum.

It was shit. And I don't have to tell you why. Just look it up, sound on, that bit is mandatory.

My first ever gamer was a disappointment lmao. I did get super into the Megadrive and everything was fixed. But man.

This is why I expect the video side of things to be more on the level of stream channels that self-host content with subscriptions for access to VoDs, rather than singular big platforms. Streaming in of itself is a lot of traffic too, but you have much bigger RoI per bandwidth spent with live viewers, and you cut down the storage requirements with limited VoD access too.

The only problem then becomes discovering these channels from the rest of the federated space, but honestly, either that will be a problem that will be solved by the space in a more general manner (oooh, imagine the return of web rings! Lol) or... It will end up being an issue that doesn't matter. Like right now, still coming from video games, MinnMax and Second Wind are two creator-owned platforms that appear to be relatively unpopular, with short amount of thousands of views, except they run off of donations on Patreons and the viewers they do have keep them afloat with a good decent margin.

No no, see, maybe they're evil because they produced an oxygen rich atmosphere in the first place and caused the collapse of other would-be lifefor-

Uh? Cyanowhat did what? You mean not the trees? But weren't they up here during the carbonara making all the coal? Oh, I see. Ah. Okay.

I guess this is why Cheating/NTR porn is also so regional in terms of popularity. Because how much it turns off others fluctuates and it lingers on the border.

One of the things most people I know like about Azula is that the show ended with her still being evil. They wrote her to be genuine with herself, and that meant no redemption.

I can always just skip those bits.

But it is annoying that they will talk Destiny updates for several minutes, but won't mention other games in passing. Like, I don't actually care about competitive Pokemon, but they just removed the Sleep Clause, which is like, the one and only thing people actually know about competitive Pokemon. You'd think they'd at least make a small comment on it, specially with all the attention Palworld got, but nah. For a multiplayer game to get a mention it seems to need to be owned by Blizzard or Epic.

They filled the "Totalbiscuit reads the weekly gaming news" niche and for that, they have my continued support and attention.