Crikeste

I mean, that’s fair. I would just hate to see people seriously hurt themselves because they don’t have access to something. But that brings up a whole new conversation, and it’s just sad that we even have to consider this.

Another aspect that came to mind is: people hurting themselves and ‘putting stress’ on the hospitals. Obviously that’s pretty unrealistic, might be a point someone would argue though.

CEOs need to get comfortable with not existing.

CEO at my job can’t even do the most menial task in the warehouse. Companies will be fine without their posh little darlings

So the guy would have been in his 50’s when he started doing this? Maybe it’s just me, but feels like there’s probably much more victims out there.

I also don’t have faith that people would do it properly. Chemicals are weird and not following instructions or not knowing what you’re doing can lead to disaster.

Oh god, you don’t want to hear what the average American has to say about Brazil. Or really, any other country than America. Americans will do anything and everything to justify the totalitarianism they live under.

Welcome to the world where money has more power than laws and governments. It’ll all work out fine, I’m sure.

I did take the question at face value, the face value was disgusting. You have big “grab them by the pussy, they let you do it” energy.

You don’t see anything ethically wrong with “owning” a piece of a human that could be someone’s ancestor or relative? People really are disgusting pieces of shit.

I’m sure there’s poison that tastes good. Go eat that, Mr. Bigot.

Brother, the owner of the business who made the ad is gay. They didn’t do this to objectify women, they did it to raise awareness about the ethics of O&G. It’s not some weird misogynist douchebag drawing this up.

This has got some weird “it’s a woman’s fault if they’re sexually assaulted” vibe. If anything, she is coerced. Chill on blaming victims.