this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
62 points (97.0% liked)

Movies

7210 readers
494 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

[email protected] - Discussing books and book-related things.

[email protected] - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

[email protected] - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

According to Schipper, the first attempt was dull because the actors were too cautious, being afraid to make mistakes; the second attempt was the opposite, as the actors went “crazy”. Schipper says he became “angry” and “terrified” after seeing the second take and realizing he had only one chance left; in a subsequent meeting, he gave the cast a “hairdryer speech ... [it] was not a meeting that ended in hugs and 'good talk.' It was crazy. But the tension was built on knowing we wanted the same thing”. Schipper believes the final attempt was successful because there was an element of “aggression” missing from the other versions.[7]

Added to my watch list, I'm super intrigued to see how the final cut turned out.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The film was shot in a single long take by Sturla Brandth Grøvlen from 4:30 to 7:00 A.M. on 27 April 2014 in the Kreuzberg and Mitte neighborhoods. The script consisted of 12 pages, with most of the dialogue being improvised.

To get financiers onboard, director Sebastian Schipper promised to deliver a version using traditional shot cutting as "plan B" if he couldn't achieve the final product in a true single take. The cut version was filmed first, over 10 days, as a series of 10-minute takes, so that Schipper would have a completed film even if the one-take version failed. Schipper has characterised the cut version as "not good". The budget permitted only three attempts at the one-take version. According to Schipper, the first attempt was dull because the actors were too cautious, being afraid to make mistakes; the second attempt was the opposite, as the actors went "crazy". Schipper says he became "angry" and "terrified" after seeing the second take and realizing he had only one chance left; in a subsequent meeting, he gave the cast a "hairdryer speech ... [it] was not a meeting that ended in hugs and 'good talk.' It was crazy. But the tension was built on knowing we wanted the same thing". Schipper believes the final attempt was successful because there was an element of "aggression" missing from the other versions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

This was such a great film! 10/10 recommend.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

1917 is very similar. May be more than one due to the main character getting knocked out. Highly recommend watching. Great War movie

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

1917 actually had a lot of cuts, they were just well hidden...

I mean I guess I wouldn't necessarily call 37 cuts a lot but it's still more than 1

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Victoria is way more technically interesting because it is truly one shot, all dialogs improvised, and literally in Berlin, no closed sets (mostly).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

While the two are alone inside, Sonne notices a piano, tinkles a bit on it and then dares Victoria to also play something

Victoria pissfingers

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Great movie. I've seen many with the "one take" premise. Time code, Russian Ark and the ones that pretend but don't really. Rope and snake eyes. Victoria is an amazing feat of filmmaking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thank you for the suggestion. I watched it and was not disappointed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

That put a smile on my face. Thanks for taking the time to comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago