this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
190 points (99.5% liked)

World News

38529 readers
2307 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Australian workers will now have the legal "right to disconnect" from work, as per a rule which came into effect on Monday. This means they can now ignore their bosses' emails, phone calls, and texts outside of work hours.

It entitles employees to ignore out-of-hours attempts by employers to contact them unless this refusal is deemed to become "unreasonable." 

"We want to make sure that just as people don't get paid 24 hours a day, they don't have to work for 24 hours a day. It's a mental health issue, frankly, as well, for people to be able to disconnect from their work and connect with their family and their life," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in an interview with national broadcaster ABC.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I would like a law to say that oncall status is allowed but then you don't have to go in otherwise for work. If you can be called any moment and have to respond to whatever crisis it should be like firemen and you can just relax and be ready.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

or at least have clearly defined on-call pay on top of your usual wage/salary. I have had this at jobs in the past but it is not standardized at all.
Add to the list of things to keep in mind and ask about when job hunting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In Europe this is the case, but most bosses ignore this. They'll say you have to be logged in or on the road in a certain time when on call and pressure you for it, but nothing about this will be in mail or in the labor agreement. You can basically ignore a call outside of normal business hours for several hours and when the boss complains you ask where this time limit is written down and he'll walk away. If there is a time limit it's a fully paid working hour for each hour on call.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not really practical. For a lot of on-call roles, you need the experience of working on the equipment daily to know how to fix it.

Even if you alternated e.g. a week of on-call then a week of normal shifts, you end up reducing the amount of time you have that is completely non-work.

Firemen are absolutely not doing nothing until called out. There's training, maintenance, cleaning, post-incident paperwork, and probably other duties.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

alternating oncall is the norm and im not saying exactly like firemen. Im saying if your oncall you should not have to clock in like normal because they want you jumping out of bed at 3am if things are bad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Usually these laws have somewhat neutered benefits though. Even though employees may have a right to ignore calls/texts/etc, the company can still decide to let you go (for "unrelated reasons") or promote other people instead. If they don't explicitly say they're doing it as retaliation for refusing to communicate after hours, you can't really hold them accountable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I misread the headline as "the right to discontent," which I think is also a good idea to codify, given the way people who speak out are often punished for legitimate complaints

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

and as consequence be fired

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago

DW News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for DW News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Germany
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.dw.com/en/australian-workers-now-have-the-right-to-disconnect/a-70045955
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support