this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
56 points (73.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29233 readers
715 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't drink fant drinks when you drive!

Fanta: ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago (3 children)

According to wiktionary infant comes from the Latin word infans, meaning "unable to speak". The term fans means "to speak".

Not sure if your Fanta can speak though :P

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

Which is why we have "infantry." Soldiers who don't speak and follow orders

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (4 children)

As a side note here, Fanta was derived from the German word โ€žFantasieโ€œ. I donโ€™t think it needs translating.

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Side note on the side note: Fanta was invented in nazi Germany because they couldn't import all the ingredients for Cola

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง fantasy
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น fantasia
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท fantaisie
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ fantazie
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ fantazia
๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ ั„ะฐะฝั‚ะฐะทะธั
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช FANTASIE

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Ah yes, a reference to the thousand year dream /s

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So it wouldnโ€™t be technically wrong to refer to mute people as infants right? /s

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Probably falls into the same or similar category as calling them dumb, ones open a time an acceptable word to call them, but not really today. You know unless you are looking to insult them for being mute.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right. The term that would probably fit the context would be "infantile", which again has negative connotations.

English has a long history of descriptors of intellectual deficiencies becoming contemporary insults then terms to be avoided because of that insensitive use, then the use continuing until everyone's kinda desensitized to it but now it can't be used in the original context.

See also: idiot, imbecile, moron, etc.

Currently going through that process: "retarded".

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Happens in most languages.

Also, many languages have a link between deafness and lacking intelligence, e.g. dumb meaning "not able to speak" and "not intelligent".

In general, being sensitive to people with disabilities (both physical and mental) is a rather young concept, hence anything that would make someone not be able to be part of society is often also an insult.

That's also why e.g. terms linked deafness/muteness are often an insult to someone's intelligence, while e.g. terms linked to blindness are not. Blind people might be unable to perform some things seeing people are able to, but blindness doesn't necessarily limit someone's ability to be part of a society unaccomodating to people with disabilities.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Might change your thoughts on blindness as an insult by attending a sporting event where a ref or ump makes a questionable call...but broadly speaking, I think your comment is definitely a worthwhile contribution.

[โ€“] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Jesse what the fuck are you talking about?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

You mean, what am I fanting about?

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If infancy is childhood, is adulthood fancy?

[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It sure as shit doesn't feel fancy

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Try it again, but with your pinky out.

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Both of those are below elefants

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Looks like it means unable + to speak. As in โ€œThis human is so young he canโ€™t talk yet.โ€

https://www.etymonline.com/word/infant

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

If your drink is talking you should already not be driving

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The in is not a prefix here. That's just how the word is spelled.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Actually, it is.

It derives from Latin infans where "in-" is a negation prefix and "fans" is the present participle form of "for", which translates to "to speak".

So an infant is a non-speaker (too small to speak).

But my opener was of course a joke, where I purpously misunderstood what "fant" is derived of, by claiming that "fant" must be the opposite of a child, thus an adult.

There are tons of Latin words in the English language and many of them only survived in English in their compounded form (e.g. "in-fant", where no other version of the actual verb in there survived, except the negated form).

Often the parts of these Latin root words have no meaning at all anymore in English, so that people don't notice that they are actually using compound words and also the original meaning of the word is forgotten.

Not a lot of people would associate "infant" with "hearing".