this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
184 points (93.8% liked)

World News

38553 readers
3305 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Notably, Chang's report claims that biological females develop earlier than males do, so requiring girls to enter school at younger ages will create classes in which the two sexes are of more equal maturity as they age. This, the author posits, makes it more likely that those classmates will be attracted to each other, and marry and have children further down the line."

(...)

"The report does not include evidence of any correlation between female students' early enrollment and the success rate of their romantic relationships with men. The author also does not detail specific mechanisms by which his proposed policy would increase romantic attraction or birthrates."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Is there something similar to national service in Korea? Just wondering how the guys keep up in the job market when the girls have a 2 year head start.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

All South Korean male citizens are required to perform 18-21 months of military service.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

All it really amounts to is a small headstart. It seems like a big gap initially because you're comparing 0 years of experience vs 2 years of experience.

But across a 30 year career its a mere 7% difference. Frankly after 5 to 10 years of experience it becomes a lot less about how long you've worked, it instead becomes more about how you've spent those years and how that translates into benefitting the company. When a company is hiring for mid level and above, it doesn't really matter to them that someone has 8 years vs 10 years. An extreme example would be someone with 5 years at Google vs someone who spent 10 years jumping between small start ups.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

i think he mean how korean males are at a disadvantage because mandatory military service. singapore has something similar but the rift is not as extreme as korea. korean males really despise feminism movement both because of that and cultural hierarchy. moon channel discussed this topic in length if youre interested

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

moon channel discussed this topic in length if youre interested

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm surprised, this is a surprise. Living in the US, Mexico has forced conscription just south of us for a while. We've also had a draft. All that being said, you made a lot of good points. We should probably credit the people who came up with this a LONG time ago.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I was going to post this video. I highly recommend it (and don't stop at its title, it covers a large amount of subjects).