this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
832 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

4919 readers
1707 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
832
Most people are only half-listening (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
113 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, he /could/ be right. He probably isn't but he could be.

Nano technology doesn't refer exclusively to like nano robots it could also just be infused with nano particles of something.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well, there's a lot of particles that are "nano" in size. And "nano" isn't a size; nano is a unit prefix.

Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec. So the meaning is irrelevant when earth is a nano "particle" (on the parsec scale).

Meaningless jibber jabber.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And “nano” isn’t a size; nano is a unit prefix.

Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec.

Thank you for the pointless pedantry

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Pointless pedantry is a specialty of mine. I'm happy to be appreciated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Pedantic. When people say micro-scale/nano-scale they mean "measured in micrometers/nanometers". So a nanoparticle is a particle with a size that makes nanometers the most convenient unit.