this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
7 points (68.4% liked)

UK Politics

3023 readers
129 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The long awaited Cass report has been published looking at gender affirming care in the NHS.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

it should be worth noting that more has come out about hilary cass's ties to the american far right and religious fundamentalists.

https://nitter.poast.org/ErinInTheMorn/status/1781017566581870606#m

I have come into possession of an email sent by Patrick Hunter of the Catholic Medical Assn to the Florida BoM, where he says Dr. Cass and her team met to share info with the Florida BoM.

Patrick Hunter was handpicked by DeSantis to ban care, and met with Cass to do so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Meeting with different groups is hardly evidence of bias on her part. The report even mentions the range of views that fed into report in the intro.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

it wasn't different group it was one group with the express stated intent to ban care for trans people

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

From the foreword:

"Throughout, the Review has focused on hearing a wide range of perspectives to better understand the challenges within the current system and aspirations for how these could be addressed. This report does not contain all that we have heard but summarises consistent themes, using direct quotes to illustrate points made, where appropriate."

How heavily does she quote this group in the report? Because the report certainly doesn't recommend banning care for trans people.