this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
974 points (79.1% liked)

Fediverse

27805 readers
248 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you're a server admin, please defederate Meta's domain "threads.net"

If you don't run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate "threads.net".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 95 points 9 months ago (24 children)

Let users decide because we’re fucking adults.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Great thing about the fediverse

People get to decide what they want from their platform

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago

Surely you're aware of the embrace, extend, extinguish corporate strategy.

People only get to decide what they want from their platform until facebook starts extending the spec. Then your client will become incompatible with some posts, and so on and so forth.

In summary, it's a threat to the platform itself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Exactly, I hereby decide that I would like to ignore corporate efforts to undermine this burgeoning new platform. I furthermore reserve the right to complain about the loss of said platform in future years by claiming that it's everyone elses fault for allowing corporate encroachment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They don't get to block instances yet.

The ability to block Instances/Threads by user would make this a non-issue.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 9 months ago (16 children)

Yeah dude let’s just federate with an instance maintained by a corporation that has undoubtedly caused a genocide in Myanmar by turning a blind eye to a far-right hate speech group that caused an entire fucking minority to flee into another country.

I don’t get why people are supporting and saying “oh it must be up to the user” like bro this is the company we’re dealing with. Fuck that fuck threads fuck zuckerberg i don’t want his shit cancer near something that’s going well so far.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Then go join threads.net? Nobody's stopping you from doing that. That would put you on a server friendly to your beliefs.

Server admins also have opinions, and are not required to take a democratic vote and each individual user's choice into account. They can decide for themselves, and they will, for good or ill. If you don't like where it ends up, your user decision should be to fuck off to threads.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that's what they're saying.

They're saying that some users and admins might choose to wait and see

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Yes, Jeffrey has, in the past, killed and eaten gay men. But we should wait and see. It's impolite not to invite him to the party!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I don't want to use their platform, but I get why some people might choose to stay federated so that there is incentive to pull people to mastodon and educate people about the issues

There's enough nuance there that I'm not dead set on either side, and I think we still have the chance to defederate later if there's an increase in spam and harmful content / disinformation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

"Jeffrey doesn't always eat people. Just sometimes. We should totally go clubbing with him and spurn him later if he eats one of us."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don’t want to join a proprietary service, but I want to be able to communicate with people who chose to join it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Facebook accounts are free, that's all ya need man

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They are not free because they deprive you of your privacy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interesting. Then why would we want lemmy drowning in all that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Because if the content is federated, then you can access it without sacrificing your privacy.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is a bigger issue to leave it to users imo. Like lemm.ee admin said a few months ago, threads is too fucking big.

Anything they push on the fediverse will be what users see in All. Plus, popular stuff on threads is determined through Facebook's algorithm, and it will also determine the fediverse recommendations by consequence.

The above is solvable if you block them I guess, but by default it will completely ruin everything.

However, lemmy 0.19 block feature doesn't work on users of an instance, only posts hosted in an instance. Add to this that Facebook is a cancerous company making all its money from ads. Expect their bots to comment and make posts pushing ads on all instances.

All of this will also mean high workload on mods to regulate the content. Threads doesn't bring anything good here, and defederation is probably the only way to protect us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

How about adding a feature to “unlist” an instance, where you could interact with it normally, but its posts wouldn’t show up in All, Popular, etc.?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The above is solvable if you block them I guess, but by default it will completely ruin everything.

Yes. One minute of a user’s time and all that’s gone.

Compare that with having to move instances due to admins blocking at the instance level.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

oh no is lose convenience

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

You have the full right to decide, you can switch servers to one that chooses to, or open multiple accounts. That's your choice. This isn't Nostr, in the Fediverse instance blocking is normal and it happens without your input, but you know what does happen with your input? Registering your account on a server that fits your needs best, or as close as possible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Generally, yes. Perhaps unpopularly, I don't need to decide about suddenly having meta content in Lemmy. I expect that's not ever gonna happen.

Having Elongated Musk or Fart Suckerberg in my stream cannot be the default, but at best, opt in.

load more comments (18 replies)