this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
300 points (93.4% liked)

memes

9671 readers
3460 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 minutes ago

firefox + ublock origin

why are people allergic to firefox?

[–] [email protected] 151 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

Wait, it's not supposed to do that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 35 minutes ago

Well that's not very typical

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago

i finally see the end for the first time lol

ty :)

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't get it, the timeline has been known since 2021 and has not changed. We are in the middle of the phase-out. All of this is really predictable.

https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate/mv2-deprecation-timeline

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Actually, as someone whose company has been working on updating extensions from MV2 to MV3 for the past four years, the timeline has changed. A couple of times, I think. Originally, MV2 was supposed to be entirely deprecated by the beginning of this year, but they've pushed it back twice and extended enterprise support even further.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

You are right, my bad, last change seems to be a year ago.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It isn't? I just read that the "Chrome MV2 deprecation enterprise rollout" is in June 2025. When is the exact date for the end v2 support? "The changes will be rolled out over the coming months to Chrome Stable, with the goal of completing the transition by the beginning of next year." is not "predictable". It can be any time between 2024 November to 2025 April, maybe even May.

Imagine giving that kind of a time to friend "yeah, I'll show up probably at the beginning of 2025, but that's the plan, it may be all the way until June 2025". Very "predictable".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

It's really standard to leave some time for users to adapt when making a big change. Especially end users. It's actually a good thing, the "friend showing up" analogy makes no sense.

End of support for users is June 2024.

But it did seem to have changed a year ago or so, my bad.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The longer they put it off, the more unnoticed it will go when they finally do it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago

Exactly, every time it's close the roar against it gets quieter. They're banking on that

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Didn’t uBlock origin just stop working with Chrome?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Still working for me

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, you post this after the one blocker that worked stops working, and then you didn't notice?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because we use Firefox or one oft its forks.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

DNS blocker + browser built-in adblocker (+ system-wide AdGuard). Be my guest.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Any browsers with good built-in adblocker besides brave? I feel like firefox's built-in content filtering does the very minimum, but I might be wrong

system-wide AdGuard

This is the way on mobile lol. The android rom I'm using comes with a built-in systemwide blocker, which I didn't know about for a very long time, so I was very confused when I saw other people using the same apps as me and seeing ads lol.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago

Firefox+uBlock Origin

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (21 children)

Firefox Mobile supports most desktop extensions now, so Ublock Origin works too

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To my knowledge there are no browsers that have anything similar to brave built in. Ublock simply is incredibly well made (that’s what braves adblocker is based on), so I would always try to use that. Gnome web has in my experience the best built in Adblock except brave (fine for everything but YouTube). AFAIK Firefox forks can change what the built in content filter blocks, at least on librewolf some ads were missing even with ublock disabled.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Give it two more years and brave will stop backporting manifestv2, then you have even less options to avoid google deciding which content needs to be shoved in your face.

I'm using Firefox since forever. In the past I have checked a few times if a swap to chromium is worth it. It never was.

I really don't understand people that prefer Google over Mozilla. Firefox works like a charm and Google already knows enough about us IMHO.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I really don’t understand people that prefer Google over Mozilla. Firefox works like a charm and Google already knows enough about us IMHO.

Firefox objectively has poor responsiveness in some apps, hence why some "works only in chrome" banners are justified. Can't quite put my finger of it, but it got a lot worse somewhere between quantum and heartbleed(but not because of it, I checked), and it never recovered. In my own projects that were time-sensitive, like 3d games and music apps, I couldn't find the source of it, but found that while some approaches led to major performance hit on firefox, others majorly hit chromium, and vice versa, and it was all about juggling to finding an approach that doesn't hit either as hard. But in some cases there were none and so I had to choose. Obviously the browser engine with a higher market share wins. And because of that, to be on par with Chrome, Firefox not only has to be better, it has to be not worse in all cases, which is a rather tough challenge.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Brave shields are based on ubo, but are patched directly into chromium so they should be immune against v3. Still going to stay on Firefox, but brave is a decent backup option. https://brave.com/blog/brave-shields-manifest-v3/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

LibreWolf ? First thing that came up when searching for a non-chrome browser with builtin adblocker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

to see it smash

I'm not really sure why I expected here but I was satisfied anyway

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Expected a Rickroll; was disappointed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

But if the extension is removed from the store you will not get updates.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›