this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
1338 points (98.4% liked)

People Twitter

4972 readers
873 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1338
Elon (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (32 children)

Do people really think we'll colonize mars soon?

Colonizing the bottom of the ocean would be orders of magnitude cheaper, and more practical. Same with Antarctica. And there's a reason we don't do that.

I hate to sound anal, but I don't think the public appreciates how monumentally difficult space travel is, and how it gets exponentially worse with every ounce you have to carry. Even with theoretical, morally questionable tech like fission fragment drives or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I'm not aware of any reason on why we'd want to colonize the bottom of the ocean, but there's many reasons to want to become a multi-planetary species. Space exploration has also lead to many technologies being used in everyday life today.

What's morally questionable about fission fragment drives?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

there’s many reasons to want to become a multi-planetary species

Yes but it's a fantasy. The scenario where mars would be truly independant of earth is basically impossible without the far more likely reality:

If we survive that long, we won't be squishy humans anymore. Uploaded, AI, genetically engineered biotech, take your pick, but shuttling regular humans around this century just doesn't make sense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Going to the moon was a fantasy at one point. I just don't see any downsides to trying to become multi-planetary. Even if it fails there would still be technology developed in pursuit of that goal that helps life on earth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

There is a big difference between a scientific mission and a self sustaining presence.

The later is still so far off that, as was said, other technological "paths" are decades, if not centuries, closer. If we survive on Earth that long.

What I am getting at is that viewing Mars colonization as a means to preserve human life is absolutely nuts. It's literally impossible in a reasonable timeframe, even with speculative technology/engineering, without changing humanity to the point that the whole fantasy changes anyway.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)