this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
266 points (92.9% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6695 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The legumes are pretty much bs though (except peanuts) as those are dry weight, cooked weight drops Pinto beans to 9 grams of protein. Protein density drops because bean weight increases through absorption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

What's wrong with reducing density through absorption (of water)?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Nothing at all. But it reduces protein density, so makes 25 grams of protein per 100 grams weight meaningless. No one is eating uncooked, dried pinto beans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

This is not a problem with the nutrition of foods, it is the metric that is poorly designed. One more argument against the chart

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)