this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
15 points (74.2% liked)

Open Source

30263 readers
80 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today I had to downgrade fastapi from 0.114.0 to 0.112.4 to make a software work. And it just hit me - what if pip didn't support 0.112.4 anymore? We would lose a good piece of software just because of that.

Of course, we can "freeze" the packages into an executable that will run for as long as the OS supports it. Which is a lot longer. But the executable is closed source. We can't see the code that is run from an executable.

Therefore, there is a need for an alternative to which we still have access to the packages even after the program is built. That would make it safely unnecessary for pip to store all versions of all packages forever more.

Any ideas?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Isn't this the whole idea behind flatpak but everyone seems to hate it

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I hate them ! How can something be flat and a package at the same time ? Those flatpackers are the flatearther conspirators of IT ! Just burn them on hot pile of logs like we are in the 17th century !!! Burrrrn !!!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

i knew i should've gone with roundpack instead :(

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)